Laserfiche WebLink
FACILITY REQUIREMENTS <br />FIGURE 3-5 <br />TAXIWAY DESIGN REQUIREMENTS – PRIMARY COMMERCIAL VS PRIMARY GENERAL AVIATION <br /> <br />Source: RS&H Analysis, 2016 <br />3.5.4.1Taxiway Deficiencies <br />Analysis of the taxiways was conducted to determine if airfield compliance deficiencies existed as <br />measured to the new standards. The deficiencies that were found are described below and are referenced <br />to specific paragraphs within AC 150/5300-13A Change 1, Airport Design (herein this section called the <br />AC). The majority of deficiencies found are related to the recommendations from FAA Engineering Brief <br />75: Incorporation of Runway Incursion Prevention into Taxiway and Apron Design, which has been <br />incorporated into the AC. Other deficiencies, that effect nearly all the taxiways at EUG, are related to <br />changes in general design, such as the design of taxiway fillets. All deficienciesdescribed are referenced <br />to their location in the current AC. Some deficiencies are safety critical and must be addressed in the near- <br />term. Others are not safety critical, and should be addressed in the next major rehabilitation project for <br />each respective piece of pavement. <br />»Taxiway A3 is an acute angle taxiway with a configuration that supports exiting aircraft on <br />Runway 16R. Section 409(a) of the AC suggests that this taxiway be perpendicular to the runway <br />to support exiting aircraft landing either direction on the runway. <br /> <br />»Taxiway A4 is an acute angle taxiway with a configuration that supports exiting aircraft on <br />Runway 16R. Section 409(a) of the AC suggests that this taxiway be perpendicular to the runway <br />to support exiting aircraft landing either direction on the runway. The taxiway also provides direct <br />access to the apron via Taxiway D, which is not recommended per Section 401(b)(5)(g). <br />EUGENE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 3-20 <br /> <br />