Ord. 20640 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES Terminal Family 4 Option 1 New construction greenfield terminal Benefits: » Completely new building design could resolve facility issues and program future areas of growth. Challenges: » Requires complete replacement of existing terminal and landside facilities » Large capital expenditure required » Requires significant utility improvement investments Source: RS&H Analysis, 2017 High level review of benefits and challenges for each terminal concept allowed them to be narrowed down to the three best alternatives on which further analysis could be performed. Family 1 options proved unfeasible as both options run contrary to the vision for the ultimate land use pattern, develop in a way that would quickly impede existing general aviation and FBO activities, intrude upon FAA Part 77 surfaces, and have limited future expansion potential. Analysis of Family 2 options demonstrates conformance to the ultimate land use pattern vision, shows potential in developing feasible implementation strategies, offers the least impact to the highest functioning general aviation facilities, and begins the process of aligning the terminal environment with leading airfield facilities. Options shown in Family 2 are all capable of achieving a building reorientation and demonstrate flexibility and a variety of paths toward achievement. Family 3 options also conform to the vision for the ultimate land use pattern, have high potential for the least disruptive implementation, and have the least impact to the highest functioning general aviation facilities. Finally, Family 4 offers new facilities built on a midfield greenfield site north of Taxiway C, however, this option is being eliminated based upon estimated capital expenditures which are projected to abilities over the next 20 years. Three concepts were carried forward and refined for stakeholder feedback as shown in Figures 4-7, 4-8, and 4-9. The first alternative concept, shown in Figure 4-7, provides a new concourse to the north stemming from a point beyond the existing security screening facilities, growing toward an ultimate concourse configuration and a new terminal in-line with the existing terminal orientation. The second alternative concept, shown in Figure 4-8, also expands concourse facilities north from a point beyond 3 security screening but turns new of building orientation and leaves additional apron space between concourses for future uses yet to be determined. The last alternative concept, shown in Figure 4-9, begins reorienting terminal facilities by expanding the existing Concourse A to the north, ultimately allowing space for the development of a new replacement terminal connected to a multiple-pier layout oriented around airfield facilities. 3 urses are built to allow the final northeast concourse to align with the airfield. EUGENE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN 4-25