Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Meisner agreed with Ms. Nathanson. He also agreed with Mr. Rayor's suggestion regarding the reference <br />to the University of Oregon. He said that the intent of the ordinance was to alert the public to the <br />consequences of the behavior and prevent it, and suggested the purpose statement be modified accordingly. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner supported the inclusion of State statute into the ordinances. He was not disturbed by the size of <br />the fines, and related penalties. He did not support the distinction between offenses made in State law. He said <br />that students were not always poverty-stricken. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 7:28 p.m. <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 28, 1999 Page 8 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />