My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 06/30/99 JEO
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
1999
>
CC Minutes - 06/30/99 JEO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:29:43 AM
Creation date
8/16/2005 9:00:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Joint Elected Officials
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Peter Sorenson, Lane County Commissioner, noted that the Lane County Department of Health and <br />Human Services administers the adult parole and probation function and it is a post trial issue. He <br />said that the courts will make pre-trial release decisions and the people that work for the Custody <br />Referee's office do not work for Lane County, they work for the courts and they have a duty to <br />determine what the risk level is of a person that had been charged with a crime and is awaiting trial. <br />He said it is a civil liberties issue to make sure they have the courts, not the executive branch of <br />government, making the release decisions. He said he was interested in hearing from prevention <br />advocates on whether there is enough prevention as the PSCC wanted. He wanted to know if law <br />enforcement favored this and if it was a fair way of allocating the costs from the general public and <br />the business community. He wanted to know what support would be shown for this measure. <br /> <br />Pat Farr, City of Eugene, echoed what Sorenson said about hearing from all elements of Lane County <br />before moving forward with this measure. He noted that unincorporated Lane County was not <br />represented at the table and they need to find out their viewpoints. He thanked the PSCC for their <br />hard work. He said he had concerns regarding additional income taxes and they are echoed <br />throughout the community. He believes that in the final analysis, the benefits of this measure will <br />outweigh the concerns. He said the big issue is the prevention element and he urged the PSCC to <br />push for more prevention. He said he believed his voice was heard as there is a great list of <br />prevention and programs that are geared toward youth to stop crime before it happens. He said with <br />regard to the alternative school program for at-risk youth, there are programs within the community <br />that are already established and he hoped that any new programs will be done in conjunction with <br />what is already happening. <br /> <br />Maine noted a concern is not duplicating services and it is directed to getting kids into a school. <br /> <br />Fred Simmons, City of Springfield, noted that the PSCC had done a wonderful job in formulating the <br />issues. He said people want to see additional dollars being spent and the issue with the County needs <br />to be handled carefully in showing how those dollars are necessary to replace vanishing dollars. He <br />added if this issue is to be placed on the ballot and be successful, they want to see new dollars for new <br />programs and enhancing existing ones. He said the voters are behind an enhanced law enforcement <br />and voters who voted against the levy said that they should have voted in the affirmative. He said <br />that communication needs to be done clearly as to what the programs will mean to the whole <br />community in both the cities and unincorporated areas. He said people he had spoken with stated <br />they did not want to have a floating issue, they want to have a defined amount of money that is fixed. <br />He wanted to have a yearly report to show how efficient it is and how it is improving public safety <br />and then they would be willing to look at it as an issue and vote on it. He said there is an attitude in <br />the community that they want to see a police presence and people who have violated the law put in <br />jail and do the time. He added they want to see that both the District Attorney and the Sheriff have <br />an adequate amount of resources to provide those public services. He said they need to go out and <br />convince the community that this is a critical part of the first part of 21st century. <br /> <br />Page 9 -- Lane County Joint Elected Officials Meeting -- June 30, 1999 <br />WP bclm1990751M <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.