Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Meisner emphasized that the Federal General Services Administration (GSA) had been active <br />participants in the group's work and whatever qualms there may have been have been mitigated by Judge <br />Hogan's interest in the local environment. He expressed disappointment that the committee did not address <br />the 3rd and 4th avenues connectors. He cited the need for local jurisdictions to consider intercity as well as <br />intracity transportation. Mr. Meisner said he was contacted by a citizen who wondered why the East Skinner <br />Butte residential area was not included in the study area. He explained that there was no interest on the <br />committee for integrating that residential neighborhood into a downtown plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rayor moved to not accept page 6 of the report. The motion to amend failed for <br /> lack of a second. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson explained that modifications, including deletions, could be made under consideration of the <br />next steps. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kelly moved, seconded by Mr. Pap6, to amend the motion by adding the phrase: <br /> "noting that recommendations with significant expenditures will come back to the <br /> council before implementation." <br /> <br /> The motion failed, 3:5; with councilors Pap~, Kelly, and Rayor voting in favor. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rayor moved, seconded by Mr. Lee, to remove the story from the report. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said he was opposed to the amendment, favoring instead a revision to address the concerns raised <br />by Mr. Rayor. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor pointed out that the story had extreme stereotypes. <br /> <br /> The motion failed, 2:6; with Mr. Rayor and Mr. Lee voting in favor. <br /> <br />Mr. Papd reiterated his concern with the train station as it exists, saying a classic, timeless structure could be <br />built in its place. <br /> The main motion passed, 7:1; with Mr. Rayor opposed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Meisner moved, seconded by Ms. Nathanson, to direct the City Manager to take <br /> steps for the acquisition of the train station as soon a possible to meet time table <br /> constraints imposed by available federal and Amtrak funding, prepare a work plan and <br /> contracts for the rehabilitation and possible expansion of the existing historic train <br /> station utilizing available federal and other funding, and to proceed with the train <br /> station being owned and managed by either a public or appropriate non-profit entity to <br /> assure long-term public benefit; and to direct staff to submit a status report to the City <br /> Council in September. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Chris Andersen clarified that the acquisition and development of the train station is <br />listed in the current CIP, including its budget with the utilization of federal transportation dollars matched by <br />Amtrak dollars. She noted that at this time no Eugene City funds were involved. She explained that the <br />federal money was earmarked for the project, but Amtrak funding was allocated annually and if the project <br />does not move forward, that funding is jeopardized. <br /> <br />Minutes--Eugene City Council July 14, 1999 Page 5 <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />