Laserfiche WebLink
scaled back. He added that his department did not have the resources to implement the North <br />End Scoping Group's recommendations. The council agreed that the item should be moved to <br />Level A. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey supported Mr. Rayor's suggestion to monitor the effect of the downtown <br />development. Mr. Farmer said staff would develop a proposal for the council's review. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said that ending the urban renewal district did not mean stop "the focus on the <br />downtown," adding that the district was simply a tool. Mr. Farmer said staff was clear that the <br />council wished a focus on the downtown. He noted, however, that district funding had supported <br />the staff assigned to downtown projects. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she saw no connection between urban renewal agency and downtown and she <br />hoped that most items under this Action Priority would be on Level A. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ said he well understood the concern with resources and looked forward to discussing <br />the allocation of resources. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson asked the council to raise any Level A items it did not want staff working on now <br />because the next goals session was scheduled for September. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she strongly opposed the transportation utility fee (TUF). The council agreed and <br />the item was deleted. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said he had asked the Citizen Charter Review Committee on Council <br />Compensation for a written report. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly indicated he would distribute other comments and questions about the goals process <br />via e-mail and suggested others to the same as a way of extending the discussion time. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ suggested extending the time line on Items 4 and 10 under Level A for the Action <br />Priority: Provide safe, efficient infrastructure until intergovernmental funding issues are settled. <br />Mr. Kelly said the intent was to proceed with the design/public input portion of these projects <br />without expending resources. <br /> <br />Addressing a question from Mr. PapS, Mr. Johnson indicated that the bonds for parks and open <br />spaces was a two-phase program and the $19,000,000 represented the first phase. He <br />wondered if the City could hold it off for a year and combine the two phases. Warren Wong, <br />Administrative Services Director, confirmed that it was possible with the use of interim financing. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner raised Councilor Nathanson's concern about complaints and code enforcement. Mr. <br />Johnson said the information had been distributed to the appropriate staff and the issue would be <br />addressed. <br /> <br /> III. WORK SESSION: CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL <br /> <br />Facilitator Margot Helphand offered the council an opportunity to highlight any items they wished <br />on the Manager's appraisal document. <br /> <br />Minutes-Eugene City Council July 26, 1999 Page 4 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />