Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Taylor said that whatever definition of sustainability the council adopts, it should include the concept of <br />not compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs, and that it should make clear that those <br />needs require protection of the environment. She liked Mr. Lee's suggestion for a resolution, and for its <br />adoption by other local governments. <br /> <br />Mr. Torrey said that a resolution was a great idea, providing there was "meat" to it. He said that he did not <br />anticipate active opposition to the resolution but cautioned the council that people may initially be skeptical. <br />He recommended that the council ask those people for their input into the content of the resolution. Mr. <br />Torrey said that the council needed to ensure that everyone understood that the City had no hidden agenda in <br />adopting the resolution. <br /> <br />Mr. Torrey asked if there was something the City could do about Delta Ponds to improve the water quality. <br />Mr. Johnson indicated staff would update the council on plans for the ponds at a future meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson agreed with Ms. Nathanson regarding the fact that life cycle costs mitigated the impact of higher <br />initial construction costs, but said the City Council, as members of the Budget Committee, would have <br />decisions to make about the tradeoffs involved if the City was restricted to building only concrete streets. He <br />suggested a tradeoff would be less maintenance. Mr. Kelly asked Mr. Johnson to identify those tradeoffs and <br />provide the council with the information needed to make those funding decisions. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee said he had to leave the meeting and indicated his support for a proposal regarding council <br />compensation that could be placed on the May 2000 ballot. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee left the meeting. <br /> <br />C.Work Session: Consideration of Motion Regarding Compensation for Mayor and Council and <br /> Discussion of City Charter Issues <br /> <br />The council considered a motion still on the table from the August 11, 1999, council work session: <br /> <br /> That the council place a charter amendment on the May 2000 ballot that <br /> calls for compensation for the mayor and city council. The council will <br /> appoint a seven-member committee to draft a viable and equitable <br /> charter amendment for review and referral by the council. Applications <br /> for the citizen committee will be accepted until September 20, 1999. The <br /> council will appoint the committee no later than October 20, ~ 999, and <br /> the committee will complete its work and forward a charter amendment <br /> draft to the council no later than February ~, 2000. <br /> <br />At the suggestion of Mr. Meisner, Mr. Kelly revised the dates in the motion to change the <br />application deadline to October 8, and the appointment date to October 27. There was no <br />objection. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner indicated support for the motion, acknowledging the quick time frame but suggesting <br />it was an achievable goal. He believed that the motion represented a clear indication of the <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 8, 1999 Page 7 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />