Laserfiche WebLink
Nathanson, Pap6, and Rayor to report to the council on the following: recommend a <br /> plan for developing options to relocate functions currently in city hall if the current city <br /> hall site is chosen. The committee should consider the following: 1) consolidation and <br /> relocation of services and activities; 2) use or disposal by sale or otherwise of other <br /> city-owned facilities; 3) new construction or remodeling; 4) timing and sequence <br /> including vacating spaces and providing for temporary spaces; and 5) cost and funding. <br /> The committee shall report to the council by November 1, 1999. <br /> <br />The council accepted the motion as amended with the friendly amendment first proposed by Mr. Pap6. <br /> <br />Mr. Torrey encouraged the council to separate the elements of the motion. <br /> <br /> Ms. Nathanson moved, seconded by Mr. Meisner, to separate the two elements of the <br /> motion. The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br /> Mr. Meisner moved, seconded by Ms. Nathanson, that the City Council supports the <br /> development of a needed new federal courthouse in downtown Eugene. Because the <br /> Fifth Street site presents significant challenges of scale, compatibility, and <br /> neighborhood impact, the council urges GSA to give serious renewed consideration to <br /> the City Hall site as a potentially better alternative for a new federal courthouse. The <br /> motion passed, 6:1; Mr. Rayor voting no. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner moved, seconded by Ms. Nathanson to authorize and appoint a council <br />committee composed of councilors Kelly, Nathanson, Pap6, and Rayor to be co-chaired <br />by councilors Kelly and Nathanson to report to the council on the following: <br />recommend a plan for developing options to relocate functions currently in City Hall if <br />the current City Hall site is chosen. The committee should consider the following: 1) <br />consolidation and relocation of services and activities; 2) use or disposal by sale or <br />otherwise of other City-owned facilities; 3) new construction or remodeling; 4) timing <br />and sequence including vacating spaces and providing for temporary spaces; and 5) <br />cost and funding. The committee shall report to the council by December 1, 1999. <br />Mr. Fart requested a response to a letter in The Register-Guard indicating the federal government could not <br />take land without compensation. <br /> <br />The council briefly discussed the timing of the committee process. Mr. Torrey said that the committee could <br />determine if the time line could be shortened. The deadline could be adjusted later. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said that staff would be involved with the committee process and staff would provide the <br />committee with information and options for proceeding. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said that staff could be directed to prepare options. She did not know why it was better for four <br />councilors to participate rather than the entire council. Mr. Meisner suggested that the issue was one of timing. <br />He pointed out that the council's agendas were somewhat full at this time. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 5:2; Mr. Rayor and Ms. Taylor voting no. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 22, 1999 Page 6 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />