CC Minutes - 10/27/99 WS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

build a new city hall. He added, however, that there was now a window of opportunity that no one could foresee. He noted that the present City Hall was not safe and was deteriorating. He thought that the council should move forward with this opportunity. Ms. Nathanson noted that Ms. Taylor's point that the public had not been saying that the City needed a new city hall was valid. She said that it was the job of councilors as leaders and staff as professionals to communicate the state of the city to citizens. She said this had not been done recently and it was time to get back on track with this via newsletters or annual reports. She noted one of the aspects of the City's problems was that capital improvements had not been adequately funded and, therefore, facilities were deteriorating. She said that council was aware of this, but that the public was not aware due to a lack of communication from council. She reiterated that it was the job of the council and the staff to explain the need for a new city hall to citizens. Ms. Nathanson suggested that the financing for this project be taken to the broad-based citizen Budget Committee. She said that it was one more avenue for public comment and awareness. Mr. Meisner agreed with Ms. Nathanson's assessment that the council had not done a good job of communicating the need to citizens. He added that he had received calls from people who used City Hall and were appalled at its condition and wondered why all the City departments were not housed at City Hall. Mr. Meisner noted that if a federal courthouse was not located in Eugene, he thought that it would be highly unlikely that there would be no federal courts here. He said that much like the City, the federal government had many offices and programs in leased space in Eugene and that the federal government wanted to bring those into a new courthouse to save money by not having to lease space. He added that the GSA and the courts had not done a good job of educating the public about their needs. Mr. Meisner noted that the City had no control over where the new federal courthouse would be located. B. Work Session: Eugene Airport Master Plan and Related Actions Mr. Johnson introduced Airport Manager Mike Boggs to give a brief overview of the Eugene Airport Master Plan and related actions. Mr. Boggs introduced Tom Schnetzer, from master planning firm of Mead & Hunt, Philip Farrington, from Satre Associates, and Bob Noble, staff for the Eugene Airport. Mr. Johnson used a slide of an aerial view of the airport to illustrate that the cooperative planning done by the City of Eugene and Lane County had been very good and had created an airport with lots of opportunities and one that was not causing lots of problems for its community. He informed councilors that the Master Plan Update was done for the following reasons: · To pick up where the 1990 Airport Plan ended and to add a new level of detail to the plan. · To add to the plan in a comprehensive way by linking the Airport Master Plan to the Metro Plan. Mr. Boggs asked Mr. Farrington to address the land planning issues of the Master Airport Plan. Mr. Farrington said that the Airport Master Plan existed as a refinement to the Metro Plan and also as a critical component to the State's Aviation System Plan and the nationwide system as well. MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 27, 1999 Page 4 5:30 p.m.