Laserfiche WebLink
reality of the document is that the elected officials through the public hearing process (over the <br /> next 20 years) will be making important decisions on what gets funded. <br /> <br /> Bob Moulton, 294 Sterling Dr., Eugene, reported he had been working on transportation issues <br /> for a long time and remembered when this started in 1992. He noted an issue that needs to be <br /> considered for Springfield and Eugene is nodal development. He added it will require work on <br /> ordinances so there are appropriate mixes of zones in the nodals. He said he is in favor of nodal <br /> development and alternative modes of transportation. <br /> <br /> Nick Ardis, ODOT, 3620 Gateway, stated that ODOT supports the adoption of the Transplan <br /> because there is a broad public participation included, the coordination between local and state <br /> government. He said it is a framework containing ODOT projects, (they support a bridge <br /> crossing over the Willamette) it is innovative and it does reduce vehicle miles traveled to a fiat <br /> rate of growth. He added they also support the plan because it does reduce the drive alone trips <br /> and improves the transit district and bicycle choices. <br /> <br /> Tom Bowerman, 33707 McKenzie View Drive, Springfield, said the document has a serious <br /> disconnect between the environmental and efficiency policy goals. He said this policy document <br /> is the most important opportunity for an elected official. He suggested to appoint a citizen <br /> advisory group to examine and propose meaningful demand management, such as free bus fares. <br /> He said to integrate the Transplan and Metro Plan more effectively including revision of the <br /> Metro Plan to incorporate effective growth management strategies. He added new development <br /> should pay significantly higher SDC's than redevelopment, including the adoption of <br /> jurisdictionally identical SDC's. <br /> <br /> Neil Deyo, 270 Ash St., Eugene, stated that areas of open space should be considered. He added <br /> free space is important and a bridge in the area of the park would be a serious detriment to open <br /> space. <br /> <br /> Connie Berglund, 2577 Harris St., Eugene, asked how new construction projects could be <br /> proposed when the cities, county and state refuse to budget for the maintenance of what is <br /> already in place. She stated the bike paths along the river have cracks and sections in bad shape <br /> and there is no money for the ongoing maintenance of the alternative transportation. She added <br /> transportation in Eugene should not be about getting awards for expensive ideas, it should be <br /> about prioritizing the safety and maintenance of all of the roads and bike paths. <br /> <br /> Bonnie Bettman, 2192 Friendly St., read into the record a letter on behalf of the Friends of <br /> Eugene. Please see Exhibit "J." <br /> <br /> Barbara Sutton, 2432 Friendly St., stated she supported the Friends of Eugene's suggestions <br /> and thinks the Valley River Bridge is a poor idea. <br /> Leslie Scott, 3977 Dillard, Eugene, said the reality is that people in this community are smart, <br /> <br />Page 9 -- Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- September 29, 1999 <br />WP bc/m/99122/T <br /> <br /> <br />