My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/12/98 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
1998
>
CC Minutes - 01/12/98 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:26:29 AM
Creation date
8/16/2005 9:25:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II. WORK SESSION: MEASURE 50 SERVICE REDUCTIONS--PROPOSAL TO <br /> REPEAL THE CONDOMINIUM AND MANUFACTURED DWELLING PARK <br /> CONVERSION ORDINANCE FROM THE EUGENE CODE <br /> <br />Linda Dawson, Planning and Development Department, presented the item. She said that the <br />proposal before the council was to repeal the Condominium Conversion and Manufactured <br />Dwelling Park Closure ordinances. She provided background on the ordinance, which was <br />adopted in the early 1980s in response to many instances where rental housing was converted to <br />condominium use and to several manufactured home park closures. The ordinances were <br />designed to address the council's concerns about the impact of those conversions and closures <br />on special category tenants, the elderly, Iow-income persons, and persons with disabilities. Ms. <br />Dawson said that there had been virtually no park closures or condominium conversions in <br />recent years, with the exception of the manufactured home park closure on Coburg Road at the <br />base of the Ferry Street Bridge. <br /> <br />Due to a lack of funds to administer the ordinances, Ms. Dawson said, staff recommended they <br />be repealed, and such situations be covered by State law. As a result of the repeal, special <br />benefits such as housing counseling services and relocation benefits would no longer be <br />available. An alternative would be to significantly raise the fees associated with the ordinances <br />to supplant lost General Fund dollars. She noted that the costs associated with the special <br />benefits associated with the ordinances were paid by the involved property owner. <br /> <br />Ms. Dawson noted that a public hearing was scheduled for January 26. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar said that the issue had first brought him into contact with the City's Planning <br />Commission. A manufactured home park closure in his neighborhood had resulted in a great <br />deal of distress to residents. Private neighborhood fund-raising had assisted many of those <br />tenants. As a result, the neighborhood proposed the ordinance to the Planning Commission, <br />which subsequently recommended its adoption to the City Council. Mr. Tollenaar pointed out that <br />the property owner was responsible for the special benefits costs of the ordinance, and <br />questioned what administrative costs were involved if the City had experienced only one park <br />closure since 1989. He did not see what it cost to leave the ordinance in place. <br /> <br />In response, Ms. Dawson said that the administrative costs begin to build when the City receives <br />an application, which was an unpredictable event. She agreed that when there was no activity, <br />there were no administrative costs associated with the ordinances. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar believed that there continued to be a need for the ordinances, particularly the <br />ordinance related to manufactured home park closures, as those facilities tended to be <br />nonconforming uses in their current zones, were difficult to relocate, and often housed many of <br />the community's most needy residents. He suggested there were alternative ways to handle the <br />administrative costs, such as through a Contingency Fund request. Mr. Meisner concurred. He <br />was concerned about the loss of both ordinances. Mr. Meisner pointed out that if the ordinances <br />were repealed, staff would no longer be monitoring such situations in the community. If a need <br />arose again for the protections included in the ordinances, they would be gone. He did not think <br />that last year's park closure would be Eugene's last such closure. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 12, 1998 Page 2 <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.