Laserfiche WebLink
government was switching to a new band and the priority would ask the LOC to urge the governor to <br />pressure state agencies to work with local governments. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka said he was surprised there was no gas tax increase on the list. He asked if the industry was <br />proposing anything. Ms. Wilson said the proposal was for a $0.14 tax, with preemption of local taxes, <br />which was unacceptable. She said a gas tax was only part of the solution to transportation funding. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka suggested adding a gas tax increase to the list. He also liked the item on LOC’s list related to a <br />statewide drug takeback program intended to reduce the amount of pharmaceuticals entering the waste <br />stream. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked when the council would discuss the City’s legislative agenda. Ms. Wilson said the IGR <br />was reviewing the City’s legislative policy document and she would be meeting with executives to identify <br />priorities for the City’s proactive legislative agenda. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said two items were of significance to her: removal of the prohibition on charging system <br />development charges (SDC) for public safety capacity (fire and police) and adjustment of the interest paid <br />on property tax appeals as 12 percent was an outrageous rate. She said issues on the LOC list such as the <br />statewide drug takeback program should also be considered. She noted that Item X would oppose legislative <br />attempts to require end of pipe standards for wastewater discharges, when those standards should be <br />supported. She regretted that legislature was backpedaling on ethics reform. She would not support a list of <br />priorities for the LOC because it was not appropriate for the LOC to lobby on behalf of the City when the <br />only item of common interest among jurisdictions was a fair and equitable property tax system. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon stated that the LOC provided value to the City and helped to identify common ground among <br />cities across the state. She pointed out that Eugene was not at the mercy of the LOC and could still advance <br />its own legislative agenda and priorities. She would support the IGR’s recommendations. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy encouraged councilors to identify those issues that they felt should be considered for the City’s <br />legislative priorities. She noted that metal theft was a major problem in the community. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka commented that water filtration systems could not cost-effectively eliminate pharmaceuticals <br />and the drug takeback program was important to water quality. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to adopt the Intergovernmental Com- <br />mittee’s five recommendations to the 2009 League of Oregon Cities (LOC) legisla- <br />tive recommendations list. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark stressed the value that the City received from its participation in LOC, which brought partners <br />together to create a stronger voice. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor clarified that the IGR was only recommending support of five items from the LOC list. <br /> <br />The motion passed, 6:1; Ms. Bettman voting no. <br /> <br />The meeting was adjourned at 7:10 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council August 11, 2008 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />