Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Cornacchia returned to the meeting at 7:57 p.m. <br /> <br />Beth Medler, 4441 Fox Hollow Road, #6, questioned why Mr. Cornacchia's was acting on behalf <br />o Hyundai. She said that the elected officials were being asked by Mr. Cornacchia to ignore their <br />constituents and the interests of the public and change the wetland regulatory rules for Hyundai. <br />She said that Hyundai should be capable of working within the community's's laws, expectations, <br />and standards. <br /> <br />Tom Pringle, 3295 Kincaid Street, said that local wetland planning was in jeopardy. He said that <br />it was a privilege to have a local planning process. He said that control should be given back to <br />the Federal agencies where the process can be objective and even-handed. He indicated that <br />he represented a group that was exploring its legal options regarding the planning process. Mr. <br />Pringle said that the amendments process had been polarized and was out of control. He said <br />that it was an unfortunate situation for those property owners who have worked within the <br />system. Mr. Pringle said that if the City lost control of the process, it was the fault of elected <br />officials taking control away from professional staff. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey called for a brief recess at 8 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 8:10 p.m. <br /> <br />Cindy Armento, 25031 Woodland Street, Veneta, expressed concern about the changes <br />proposed by Mr. Cornacchia. She could see no reason for the changes as she believed they <br />would result in further wetlands degradation. Ms. Armento said that Hyundai knew the existing <br />rules when it purchased the wetlands for construction of a factory. She said that all should have <br />to abide by the rules. <br /> <br />Emily Fox, 455 East 31st Avenue, was opposed to Mr. Cornacchia's proposals and said he did <br />not have a clear idea of ecology. She said that while Mr. Cornacchia expressed concern about <br />the fact the supply of campus industrial land was eroded by wetlands, the fact was wetlands <br />came first. She suggested that conversely, campus industrial had eroded the health of wetlands <br />through the country. <br /> <br />Ms. Fox echoed Ms. Arkin's remarks regarding development criteria 4. She said that it was so <br />vague any could say they had an idea and so should be able to develop their property as desired. <br />Ms. Fox asked the elected officials to accept the recommendations of the planning <br />commissions, which were crafted with the benefit of public involvement. <br /> <br />David Zupan, 870 West 23rd Avenue, represented Eugene Peaceworks. He supported the plan <br />amendments as recommended by the planning commissions. He wanted to preserve what was <br />left of the wetlands and protect the public trust. He was concerned about the possible betrayal of <br />public trust by Mr. Cornacchia. He said that Mr. Cornacchia's recommendations were a "slap in <br />the face" to his constituents, an example of "good old boy" politics, and contrary to sound <br />scientific planning. He said that the recommendations did not represent a balance. <br /> <br />Deborah Higbee, 1281 Dalton Street, represented the Many Rivers Group of the Sierra Club. <br />She said that some places should not have buildings on them because plants and animals <br />depend on those places. She believed that the community would further devalue its wetlands if it <br />accepted Mr. Cornacchia's recommendations. Ms. Higbee said that campus industrial uses <br />should not be sited on wetlands. She said the plan represents years of work, citizen input, and <br /> <br />MINUTES--Joint Elected Officials-- February 18, 1998 Page 11 <br /> Eugene City Council/Lane County Board of Commissioners <br /> <br /> <br />