Laserfiche WebLink
was not covered by the program because local government had no authority to impose <br />restrictions on State agencies. She said that software for reporting of Toxics Right-to-Know <br />program data would be available by <br />June 1 and would not represent any changes from previously announced requirements. She said <br />she supported having a Toxics Right-to-Know Charter amendment because it provided better <br />safeguards for citizens. <br /> <br />Moshe Immerman, 3455 Onyx Place, said he believed it was appropriate to include Toxics <br />Right-to-Know provisions in the City Charter because it was a right of citizenship. He described <br />Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) levels and suggested they could become a good base on <br />which to calculate future fees for the program. <br /> <br />Determining that there were no additional persons wishing to testify, Mayor Torrey closed the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br /> B. Council Deliberation <br /> <br />Mr. Laue observed that the obstacle of local governments being unable to regulate state <br />agencies was a long-standing problem faced by cities in many different areas. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee said that he believed the differentiation between quantity and quality of toxic chemicals <br />was important and should be considered in the establishment of future program fees. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee commented that the community had been polarized during the campaign preceding the <br />adoption of the Toxics Right-to-Know Charter amendment, but that the Toxics Board had brought <br />the community together and that Eugene was becoming a leader in the field in Oregon. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov asked how thresholds for the reporting of toxic chemicals had been <br />established. Ms. O'Brien replied that thresholds were established at five percent of estimated <br />current emission levels, that input/output accountability made reporting possible, and that a State <br />task force was seeking to eliminate disparate reporting requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar said he believed a single line amendment to the City Charter identifying citizen's <br />rights was appropriate, but that he believed the adopted amendment went inappropriately into <br />legislative prescriptions. <br /> <br /> V. ORDINANCE CONCERNING PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />Ms. Elmer announced that the council would consider Council Bill 4639, an ordinance concerning <br />public hearings; amending Section 2.007 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring an <br />emergency. She reminded councilors of its previously held study session and public hearing on <br />the ordinance. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fart moved, seconded by Mr. Tollenaar, that Council Bill 4639, with <br /> unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by council bill <br /> number only, and that enactment be considered at this time. The motion was <br /> adopted unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br />Ms. Elmer announced that the council would consider Council Bill 4639 by number only. <br /> <br />Minutes--Eugene City Council March 9, 1998 Page 7 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />