Laserfiche WebLink
sidewalk, curb or monolithic curb or gutter abutting the person’s property in such repair as not to <br />present an unreasonable risk of danger to person or property. <br />C. A person shall be relieved from the obligation imposed by subsection A of this section if the person <br />notifies the City in writing of the need for reconstruction, maintenance or repair and the city engineer <br />determines that: <br />1. The sidewalk, curb or monolithic curb and gutter in question is part of an arterial or <br />collector street, that the abutting property is not entitled to a curb cut or driveway on to that <br />street, and that the abutting property is a through lot required to be screened from the <br />abutting right-of-way by fence or landscaping such as to disallow direct pedestrian access to <br />the right-of-way from the property; or, <br />2. The sidewalk, curb or monolithic curb and gutter in question was constructed by the City <br />within the last year and the risk of danger arises more from defective material or <br />workmanship than from external forces. <br />The city engineer’s determination shall be sent in writing to the property owner and shall be final unless <br />within ten days from the date the determination is sent, the property owner files with the City Recorder <br />a written notice of appeal of same. <br />D. Nothing in this section is intended to relieve a person owning property abutting the right-of-way from <br />the liability imposed by subsection B of this section, unless and until the property owner notifies the City <br />as provided in subsection C of this section and the City’s resulting nonfeasance or malfeasance is held to <br />constitute a supervening cause of any personal injury or property damage arising from the condition of <br />the property after the property owner gives notice. [BC 3.06.015, amended by Ordinance No. 3604, <br />January 25, 1988.] <br />Mark Olson out of town. Left voicemail. Spoke with Kiffy in front office. She said property owners are <br />responsible for finding a contractor. <br />CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO- <br />Sidewalks are the responsibility of the adjacent property owner to maintain and keep free of debris. <br />Broken sidewalks that are damaged by tree roots or other causes should be repaired to provide safe <br />pedestrian access. <br />CITY OF ROSEBURG- <br />The owner of land or real property abutting a sidewalk, retaining wall, driveway, drainage facility, <br />culvert or other improvement shall maintain such improvements in good repair and safe condition. Any <br />repair or replacement of sidewalks requires a permit to be obtained from the Public Works Department <br />prior to commencing the work. The City of Roseburg does have a sidewalk rehabilitation program, <br />available for residential areas only. The program requires the property owner to pay for the cost of <br />materials and the City will absorb the cost of the labor.