Laserfiche WebLink
number of undesirable persons who used the provisions of the ordinance and about children who <br />were involved. <br /> <br />Erin Kuch, 2295 Riverview Street, commended business owners negatively affected by <br />provisions of the ordinance for their efforts to deal with its negative impacts. She said she <br />supported extension of the ordinance with adjustments to eliminate the cost to businesses in <br />industrially zoned areas. She said she was willing to become involved as a catalyst to develop <br />conversation between business owners, homeless persons, and female employees. <br /> <br />Danielle R. Smith, West 7th Avenue, described her bus motor home. She expressed <br />appreciation to the council for the ordinance because it had given her a winter of peace and she <br />encouraged that it be extended. She thanked owners of businesses affected by overnight <br />parking for their patience and support. She described her experience as a person not living in a <br />conventional house and said she often was made to feel like a second-class citizen and a <br />scapegoat for community problems. She urged Lane County and the City of Springfield to join in <br />the efforts of Eugene to find solutions to problems of homelessness. <br /> <br />Tom Musselwhite, 458 Blair Boulevard, stated that he believed the role of government was to <br />mitigate the effects of a market economy on persons who were poor. He discussed issues <br />related to affordable housing. He said the ordinance did not address the need for appropriate <br />shelter, but that it was "morally turning a corner." He said he believed issues related to addiction <br />and homelessness could be addressed and that he would continue to press for increased <br />affordable housing opportunities. He said he supported extension of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Jake DuDell, 890 West 12th Avenue, expressed appreciation to the council for its continuing <br />support of programs dealing with issues of homelessness. He said he supported extension of <br />the ordinance. He described his work with church groups participating in the program enabled by <br />the ordinance and said that the number of vehicles in church parking lots could be increased. He <br />said he was sympathetic with the concerns of businesses negatively affected by the ordinance, <br />but said he believed the issues would be solved by better management, not elimination of the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Rudy Vallejo, 2642-B Ross Lane, said that he had participated in the church parking lot program <br />and described the trailer, electricity, and sanitation facilities provided. He encouraged the council <br />to keep the ordinance which make the program possible. He suggested that businesses work <br />with the council to devise agreements which would address their concerns. <br /> <br />James A. McDermott, 4924 Cone, said that he was opposed to continuation of the ordinance. <br />He described his experience of numerous burglaries and trash dumpster problems since the <br />institution of the ordinance. He said he had invited homeless persons to park in the lot of his <br />business. He said he did not believe police protection for business owners was adequate. <br /> <br />Dave Vitus, 2358 West 7th Place, stated that his family had owned and operated an electrical <br />business in Eugene for three generations and that it had never experienced a burglary until the <br />ordinance was enacted. He described the damage and danger he has experienced and <br />suggested that he did not support continuation of the ordinance because it created the possibility <br />of armed conflict. <br /> <br />MINUTES-City Council May 11, 1998 Page 8 <br /> <br /> <br />