Laserfiche WebLink
ordinances. Judge Allen said that those cases would have the most impact on defense and <br />prosecution services rather than the court. It was typical that the defense and prosecution <br />resolved the case outside of court. Judge Allen said that the court did not have many <br />contentious trials. He added that such cases would also have some lesser impact on staff. <br /> <br />Judge Allen emphasized that the court was ill-equipped to deal with cases such as sex abuse, as <br />it lacked a system to ensure follow-through with the family and the offender. The court had no <br />probation officer, evaluative program, or treatment to offer offenders. He speculated that the <br />court might be able to accept some more minor offenses from the District Attorney's Office on the <br />basis that the District Court retained those cases the court was not prepared to address. <br /> <br />Mr. Torrey asked if cases involving parental control, such as in the failure of a parent to exercise <br />the proper control over a juvenile, were heard by Municipal Court. Judge Allen said that the City <br />would have to adopt the existing State law for the court to hear such cases. He noted that <br />Springfield had adopted the State criminal code. City Attorney Glenn Klein confirmed for Mr. <br />Torrey that the City of Eugene had not adopted the State criminal code. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Torrey, Judge Allen said truancy cases were not heard in <br />Municipal Court but were referred to the Justice Court in Springfield. He believed those cases <br />were referred to that venue because it was a County court. <br /> <br />Mr. Torrey said that the council would take no action on the evaluation until its June 3 meeting. <br /> B. Work Session: Ordinances Related to the Downtown Mall <br /> <br />Jan Bohman, Office of the City Manager, noted that staff had consulted with Judge Allen and Ms. <br />Nelson in the preparation of procedures for an appeal process. They had also discussed the <br />impacts of the ordinances on the court with staff. <br /> <br />Ms. Bohman provided the council with the background on the development of the ordinances. <br />She emphasized that staff was not offering the ordinances as a comprehensive solution to issues <br />on the mall, but envisioned them as part of a multi-faceted approach that also included the <br />summer youth program. <br /> <br />Ms. Bohman provided an overview of the proposed ordinances. She noted that similar City <br />ordinances governed other City facilities, such as parks, community and senior centers, and <br />library, and recreation facilities. Ms. Bohman reported that the Council Committee on Public <br />Safety discussed the proposed ordinances, suggested some revisions, and forwarded the <br />ordinances to the full council without a recommendation as members wished to hear the <br />comments of other councilors. <br /> <br />Ms. Bohman briefly reviewed the revisions suggested by the council committee. <br /> <br />Ms. Bohman highlighted the potential of a legal challenge to the ordinances that could involve <br />legal costs. <br /> <br />Officer Scott Fellman, Eugene Police Department, identified himself as the foot patrol officer for <br />downtown. He described examples of incidents that occurred on the mall during the week of <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 13, 1998 Page 4 <br /> 11:30 a.m. <br /> <br /> <br />