My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 05/20/98 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
1998
>
CC Minutes - 05/20/98 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:28:49 AM
Creation date
8/16/2005 9:36:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
explained that if the urban renewal increment was insufficient to make the debt service, funding for the Debt <br />Service would go directly to the GF and take GF resources, which could mean reductions or elimination of GF <br />services. The problem was that the only revenue source coming into urban renewal, under the concept here, <br />has been counted toward making the debt service payments. The two revenue streams were the loan <br />repayments and the tax increment. Mr Wong added that if the urban renewal revenue stream decreased, it <br />would be related to an economic downturn and would also impact several other projects where GF funds have <br />been pledged, i.e., parking garages and purchase of the Atrium. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson summarized the discussion by saying that the decision hinged on the likelihood that the <br />increment will be sufficient or will not be sufficient. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Meisner, Mr. Wong said the effect of a negative bond rating change would <br />be a higher interest rate, which reduced the amount of the bond. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov said she initially supported the $2 million set aside but given the discussion she <br />would support the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee said some did not consider the library a magnet for drawing people downtown, adding he believed <br />the library downtown provided social benefits. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey encouraged the council to look for ways to identify funds to accomplish the types of projects <br />downtown suggested by Ms. Nathanson. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said the draw to the library was a function of library programming. She envisioned services <br />that would be a draw. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov drew attention to the vote, saying the council was united in its support for the library. <br /> <br />Mr. Bowers reviewed the summary of funding options for the library using urban renewal funds, and <br />underlying assumptions. He called attention to meeting materials that depicted the impact to the individual <br />taxpayer. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Meisner, Mr. Klein said if the district sunseted, any remaining money in <br />the fund goes back to the County to be distributed to the overlapping taxing districts--any returned to the City <br />goes to the GF to be used for anything the council chooses. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar said there would be an issue of whether "we can get by" with one central library or branches are <br />needed. He added that it was possible to phase-in branches and levy anywhere within the spectrum. <br /> <br />Addressing a question from Ms. Swanson Gribskov, Mr. Bowers said the council had the choice of setting the <br />levy to just cover the debt service, or levy up to the full amount and bank the balance for future expansion. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Lee, Mr. Bowers said the council each year would decide how much to <br />levy as part of the budget process. <br /> <br />Minutes--Eugene City Council May 20, 1998 Page 5 <br /> 11:30 a.m. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.