Laserfiche WebLink
Wastewater Division Director Peter Ruffler acknowledged the presence of Susie Smith, Director of the <br />Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC). He noted that the FY99 MWMC budget had <br />already been adopted by the commission and under the intergovernmental agreement, each of the three <br />governing bodies must also ratify the budget. Mr. Ruffler said the bottom line was that there is no change <br />proposed in the regional user rate structure. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith distributed a copy of her May 21, 1998, memorandum to the commission on rate comparisons <br />using the Association of Metropolitan Sewage Agencies (AMSA) Index. <br /> <br />Addressing a question from Ms. Swanson Gribskov, Mr. Ruffler said a citizens advisory committee <br />researched system development charges (SDCs) and made recommendations. Ms. Smith recalled that the <br />committee, representing a broad cross-section of the community, reached consensus in recommending a new <br />methodology for assessing rates and greatly improved the base of knowledge for the area. She noted that the <br />jurisdictions adopted the methodology and there have been no problems with the rate schedule. Ms. Swanson <br />Gribskov ascertained that the SDC revenue was a small but important addition to the capital improvement <br />program. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner noted that the annual cost-of-living adjustments were different between the two communities and <br />wondered why that was so. Mr. Ruffler said the figures reflected the fact that there was no cost-of-living <br />adjustment in Eugene last year but there was in Springfield. Mr. Meisner expressed concern with the indirect <br />overhead costs, particularly Eugene's. He asked for a comparison of billing entries between the Eugene <br />Water & Electric Board (EWEB) and the Springfield Utility board (SUB). Ms. Smith said the City of <br />Springfield did a comparison study of billing costs by utilities providing the service and were able to <br />renegotiated a decreased charge per bill from SUB, which was, however, still above the middle of the range <br />for the state. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Laue, Mr. Ruffler said there was sufficient base capacity to serve both <br />communities through the year 2017. <br /> <br />Addressing a question from Ms. Swanson Gribskov, Mr. Ruffler said there is a sinking fund for equipment <br />replacement funded on a regular basis and one for major rehab based on revenue generation. He added that <br />the capital costs will be paid for partly by SDCs supplemented by other funding if needed. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Tollenaar, Mr. Ruffler said biosolid (sludge) management entails air- <br />drying the biosolids and then land-applying them. The current system can only handle about 50 percent of <br />the sludge generated on an annual basis, but a de-watering process project was planned that will add the <br />required capacity. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey commended what he called "the finest example of intergovernmental cooperation" in the area. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tollenaar moved, seconded by Mr. Lee. to ratify the Metropolitan Wastewater <br /> Management Commission budget for FY 1999. Roll call vote. The motion passed <br /> unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br />Ms. Smith personally thanked the council for its sympathetic comments at the beginning of the meeting, <br />adding that the City of Springfield organization was very appreciative of the City's and council's support. <br /> <br />Minutes--Eugene City Council May 26, 1998 Page 2 <br /> 6p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />