Laserfiche WebLink
consideration of the ordinances by the Council Committee on Public Safety and input received <br />from the Human Rights Commission, representatives of the American Civil Liberties Union, <br />Looking Glass, Legal Aid, the Public Defender's Office, Downtown Eugene Incorporated, <br />downtown businesses, and City of Portland human rights staff, police, and city attorney. <br /> <br />Ms. Bohman said that changes had been made to the proposed ordinances in response to <br />concerns raised by various groups--provision for legal passage through the mall during its closure <br />was added, an administrative hearing was replaced with a hearing before a Municipal Judge out <br />of concerns raised about due process, and willful violation of mall rules was removed as a cause <br />for exclusion. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Ms. Taylor, Ms. Bohman explained that the area of the downtown <br />pedestrian mall between Willamette and Oak Streets was not included because there was a <br />desire to limit the closure area as much as possible and because it was not an area currently <br />experiencing difficulties dealt with by the ordinances. <br /> <br />Martin Champion, 1430 Willamette Street #597, expressed appreciation to the Mayor for his <br />expressions of concern about the Thurston High School shooting incident. He said he was <br />concerned about the proposed mall ordinances because he believed they did not meet <br />constitutional requirements for due process. He said he did not believe the appeal hearing <br />process included in the ordinances would withstand a legal challenge. <br /> <br />Chuck Theobald, 1290 Jackson Street, said that he was opposed to the proposed exclusion <br />ordinance because it would deny members of the public access to public space without <br />conviction of a crime. He said he was also concerned because the exclusion ordinance could be <br />applied unequally based on a person's appearance. He said he believed the proposed closure <br />ordinance also denied a right of access to a public street. He said he saw no need for either <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Paul Prensky, 933 East 29th Avenue, stated that he appreciated the attempt of the council to <br />address the serious problem faced by downtown businesses and separating youth from bad <br />influences. He said he was concerned, however, that illegal activities on the downtown mall <br />would only be displaced by the ordinances and create a series of areas needing extra police <br />services. He said he did not believe crime prevention was promoted through "police power" <br />ordinances. <br /> <br />Russ Brink, 132 East Broadway #103, stated that Downtown Eugene Incorporated supported <br />the proposed ordinances for a nine-month trial period. He said the environment in the mall area <br />was steadily deteriorating and that the public space in it was being used by only a small portion <br />of the community. He said a public mall had few security options in comparison with a private <br />mall. He described how the proposed ordinances had been developed through hours of <br />discussion among mall representatives, City staff, and police. He pointed out how the proposed <br />ordinances were similar to others already in force throughout the City and that they provided <br />alternate tools for use by the police. He said he believed the ordinances were directed against <br />crime, not youth. He urged the council to support passage of the ordinances. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey determined there was no one else wishing to testify and closed the public hearing. <br />The meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. <br /> <br />MINUTES--City Council May 26, 1998 Page 5 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />