Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Swanson Gribskov said she believed that use of urban renewal resources for a new library <br />should not be tied to the approval by voters of a local option levy for its operation. She said she <br />also believed a high maximum indebtedness to complete the project should be chosen. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said she also believed that use of urban renewal resources for a new library <br />should not be linked to a local option levy and that a high maximum indebtedness for the project <br />should be set, even though it would never be used. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said that she believed the lowest possible maximum indebtedness should be set for <br />the library project. She said she reluctantly supported committing use of urban renewal <br />resources for construction of a library without a vote of citizens and that she supported proposing <br />a local option levy to support library operations, but not if it meant there would be no proposal to <br />acquire parks and open space. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee said he believed the council should seek voter approval of a local option levy to support <br />library operations in November 1998. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said he also supported proposing a local option levy for library operations in <br />November and that, in order to allow the most flexibility in future years, he favored identifying a <br />high maximum indebtedness for the project. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar said the he favored disconnection of use of urban renewal funds for a library from <br />approval of a local option levy for library operations. He noted that branches were a concern for <br />a significant number of citizens and suggested that they needed to be included in a levy <br />proposal. He said he was concerned that setting a high maximum indebtedness for the project <br />could frighten voters, but that if a medium level of indebtedness was set, it would mean that <br />library construction was not likely until the year 2010. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson pointed out that the high, medium, and Iow maximum indebtedness scenarios <br />discussed in the earlier council work session had factored in five percent inflation of construction <br />costs. He noted that the medium scenario had only $10 million left for future additions. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar stated that if a local option levy for library operations was not approved by voters by <br />November 2000, he felt it would be safe to conclude that voters did not want a new library. <br />Mr. Laue stated that he favored disconnecting use of urban renewal funds for construction of a <br />library and approval of a local option levy for its operation. He said he shared the concern of Ms. <br />Taylor for the importance of also proposing a measure to voters to acquire parks and open space <br />land. He said he was not concerned about setting a high maximum indebtedness for the library <br />project because he felt the inflation factors calculated were too high. He said he believed a local <br />option levy to support library operations should be limited to two times the current operating costs <br />plus the cost of creating and operating library branches and that an amount to acquire parks and <br />open space land should also be included. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey stated that he also favored disconnecting the use of urban renewal funds for <br />construction of a library and approval of a local option levy for its operation. He said to not do so <br />could result in 60 percent of current urban renewal revenue going to non-Eugene projects. He <br />also said he favored beginning development of the library soon because of the increased cost <br />created by delayed construction. He said he believed all members of the council supported <br />creation of library branches and that funding for them should be included in a local option levy. <br /> <br />MINUTES--City Council June 1, 1998 Page 9 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />