Laserfiche WebLink
measure. He identified the Council Committee on Public Safety public safety measure as his first <br />priority, with the library as his second. He said his next priority would be a modest parks and <br />open space bond-based measure focused on neighborhood parks in the north and west sectors, <br />followed by ball fields. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner thanked the committee for its work and said he preferred a longer-term measure, <br />perhaps taking options on some properties as suggested by Ms. Swanson Gribskov. He said he <br />did not hear that parks were a great priority in central Eugene and the challenge was to find <br />support for parks in the outlying areas where they are needed. <br /> <br />Mr. Laue said a $15 million measure on a 10-year capital levy provided the best chance for <br />success at the ballot. Mr. Smith said if that were chosen, it would take three years to do the <br />Amazon Pool. Mr. Laue suggested a general obligation (GO) bond instead. <br /> <br />Mr. Fart asked how the City could build a partnership with citizens for parks, suggesting grants to <br />neighborhoods to develop and maintain parks. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey noted support at the $15 million level, adding that that did not preclude the <br />committee from coming up with an enhanced version of Option 3 (the A and A-plus option). <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov suggested more modest improvement to the Amazon Pool and wondered <br />about the possibility for partnerships for operation with nonprofits. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor suggested that the committee bring back a range of options, including a $40 and $50 <br />million options. She said she opposed placing two measures in one on the ballot, i.e., Option A <br />and Option A Plus. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said the committee would address the majority position or the sense of the <br />majority positions expressed, adding that she shared concern with ballot congestion and hopes <br />voters are willing to pass two "Eugene" measures. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said it will be difficult for voters to turn down any measure for the school district. <br />Mr. Smith said he has learned that the district plans to introduce a $8.4 million "mini-bond," <br />adding the impact on the voter of that is about $17. <br />Ms. Nathanson said the irony of the choices had to do with the issues of urgency and political <br />feasibility; if the urgency was around land acquisition, the council should construct a measure <br />that has the most likelihood of passing, making the dilemma that much harder. <br /> <br />Addressing a question from Ms. Swanson Gribskov, Mr. Smith said the next discussion was <br />scheduled for July 8, followed by a public hearing the following week. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />James R. Johnson <br />City Manager Pro Tem <br /> <br />(Recorded by Yolanda Paule) <br />R:~1998~Admin Services~CIS~Council~Cc980608ml. wpd <br /> <br />Minutes-Eugene City Council June 8, 1998 Page 6 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />