Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Tollenaar said that he believed there would be ambiguity in the minds of voters regarding the <br />amending the charter as proposed. He said the ordinance would remove legal restrictions to <br />having the City Council establish a citizen review board, but did not establish such a board. He <br />suggested that consideration be given to changing language in the proposal related to <br />establishing a board from permissive to directive. He said if the proposed technical revision to <br />the charter in the ordinance was turned down by voters, it would be difficult for the council to <br />establish a citizen review board within the current provisions of the charter. <br /> <br />Mr. Laue stated that he believed it would be important to notify those who had indicated they <br />wished to testify at the public hearing but were not present of the re-scheduled additional date for <br />it. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey determined that, in the light of the lateness of the hour and the number of persons <br />who had requested to present testimony, speakers would be limited to two-minute presentations. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Jayson Jones, No Address Provided, stated that he had attended meetings of the External <br />Review Advisory Committee. He said he did not believe members favored establishing a citizen <br />police review process with personnel appointed by the City Manager. He said he believed the <br />process would require budgetary support, but that a great deal of the administrative support <br />discussed he considered administrative bureaucracy. <br /> <br />Ron Chase, 1775 West 14th Avenue, said that he believed the External Review Advisory <br />Committee had worked hard to retain the authority of the Police Chief and protect the <br />constitutional rights of police officers in its recommendation about a review process. He said the <br />proposal was not radical and was an idea whose "time had come." He said he believed further <br />implementation of community policing practices in Eugene could bring increased conflicts with <br />citizens. He said the proposed review process was not anti-police. He urged the council to <br />support placing the charter amendment on the ballot. <br /> <br />Elaine Green, 803 Sundance Street, stated that she was chair of the External Review Advisory <br />Committee. She said she believed the proposed charter amendment and ordinance calling a <br />special election accurately reflected the wishes of the committee. She said she recognized the <br />risk of putting the amendment proposal before voters and the trade-off of utilizing currently <br />available procedures for forming a police review process. <br /> <br />Charles Dalton, 1040 Lamplight Lane, stated that he supported establishing a police review <br />process because it would make it easier and safer for the police to do a good job. He said it <br />would eliminate a level of divisiveness in the community. He said the cost of the proposed <br />program would be less than those incurred from litigation which could result from not having it in <br />place. He said he also favored the process because it would give police an opportunity to say, <br />"I'm sorry." <br /> <br />Nicola Calvert, 41 North Adams Street, was not present. <br /> <br />James Johnston, Post Office Box 10455, said he was resentful that the public hearing was <br />being held at such a late hour and that speakers were limited to two minutes. He said many who <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 8, 1998 Page <br />15 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />