Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Nathanson said that she supported appropriate display of the flag and that she considered <br />her reaction to the current proposal to be a design issue. She said she was willing to approve a <br />replacement for the cross, but that the current proposal was unacceptable and that the current <br />meeting did not allow time to fully consider other options. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov said she believed all members of the council were concerned with how to <br />express honor and appreciation for military veterans and the flag, but that she believed the <br />current proposal was too large for Skinner Butte. She proposed that consideration be given to <br />relocating the current granite veteran's memorial to the top of the butte, and adding a modest <br />flag pole of the size located at City Hall with a flag that could be displayed on particular <br />ceremonial occasions. <br /> <br /> Ms. Swanson Gribskov moved, seconded by Mr. Meisner, to direct the City <br /> Manager to develop additional options for a war memorial on Skinner Butte <br /> for consideration by the City Council, including moving the granite veteran's <br /> memorial with a flag pole to the summit; and that the matter be rescheduled <br /> for consideration by the council after development of the options. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee described the experience and recognition of the importance of the American flag by his <br />family and suggested that all citizens be given an opportunity to express their views on the <br />proposed war memorial flag on Skinner Butte through a referendum vote. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said he was concerned that public support and opposition to the proposed war <br />memorial flag was becoming divisive to the community. He reported that he had received threats <br />of violence if he opposed the placement of a flag on Skinner Butte. He said he hoped the council <br />could develop a solution to the issue which would benefit the entire community. He said he <br />believed there was a need to be respectful of freedoms for which veterans fought the wars of the <br />nations. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said that she was not prepared to support any proposal for developing a war memorial <br />on Skinner Butte and that she believed the entire community should be part of any decision <br />which was made. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr said that he believed the council had removed the cross from Skinner Butte because it <br />did not represent everyone in the community and that the council needed to find a different <br />symbol to place there which did represent everyone. He described the experience of his family <br />as emigrants to the United States and said that the flag represented, for them, a symbol of <br />freedom from oppression. He said he favored placing an acceptably sized flag on the butte to <br />symbolize freedom and that he did not believe such an expression was blind patriotism. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar stated that he agreed with the sentiments of most who had spoken and that he was <br />surprised at the controversy which had risen in response to the proposed war memorial flag. He <br />said he agreed that the flag was an ambiguous symbol and meant different things to different <br />people. He said he was impressed with a statement made by a representative of the Eugene <br />Rotary Club that any flag on the butte should be consistent with the value the location had as a <br />viewpoint of the City. He said he would support the motion to enable consideration of additional <br />options for the butte. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 8, 1998 Page 9 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />