Laserfiche WebLink
committee's work. The committee did considerable research and heard from a broad range of <br />people. She reminded the council of the inclusive composition of committee. Ms. Green <br />believed the proposal was good community policing, and would increase the legitimacy of the <br />Police Department. She said the proposal increased opportunities for the public to provide input <br />without undermining the department's command structure. She asked the councilors to forward <br />the ballot measure to public, and to give the proposal their personal support. <br /> <br />Craig Miller, 1275 West 17th Avenue, said the council should be more concerned about quality of <br />life issues. He supported the proposal to place the measure on the ballot as a means to improve <br />the quality of life. <br /> <br />Nick Urhausen, 2858 Lawrence Street, suggested the proposal was a "consolation prize" for <br />those who failed to prevail on June 1, 1997. He suggested that the police had demonstrated <br />restraint in dealing with the protesters. He supported putting the measure on the ballot so people <br />could turn it down. <br /> <br />Misha Seymour, 1313 Lincoln Street, #306, asserted that the public hearing rules had been <br />changed. He averred the police had been out of control in certain situations. He cited two <br />fatalities created by a single officer as an example. He said that the Portland police had initially <br />not favored a review board but had changed its position. He called for diverse representation on <br />the review board. <br /> <br />Randy Prince, PO Box 927, Eugene, asked that the measure be referred to the voters and <br />asked the council to advocate the measure before the community. He said that the council must <br />acknowledge there was a problem with police and community relations and to do something <br />about it without allocating blame. Mr. Prince said that a conspicuous police response to <br />insignificant incidents had a detrimental physic effect on the health of the community. He spoke <br />of the increasing culture of violence in the country. <br /> <br />Bernardino De La Torte, 2615-1/2 Adams Street, expressed concerned about the lack of <br />monitoring of police officer behavior, particularly when officers were responding to members of <br />the community who were culturally or ethnically different. He said that he had experienced abuse <br />by the police and observed police abuse toward others with a similar cultural background. Mr. De <br />La Torte questioned the legitimacy of the existing review process; he believed the department <br />lacked accountability about such abusive behavior. He said that many police policies were racist <br />and were centered around tactical policing and the military occupation of the city. Mr. De La <br />Torte said that such an approach was at odds with community policing. He said that many <br />community residents had "felt many times the heavy oppressive hand" of many rogue police <br />officers who were racist. <br /> <br />Beth Medler, 4441 Fox Hollow Road, #6, encouraged the council to support the proposal and to <br />place it on the ballot. She said that her jury experience made her more supportive of police <br />review board, and indicated she would be happy to share those experiences with anyone. She <br />said that the community should hold all public servants accountable. Justice must prevail for the <br />individual. She said that the review board was an opportunity for the City to exercise <br />responsibility. <br /> <br />Bo Arian, 3785 Pine Canyon Road, endorsed the comments of others who wanted the council to <br />refer a proposal regarding a police review board to the voters. He did not want the council to <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 22, 1998 Page 4 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />