Laserfiche WebLink
ending June 30, 1999, with the following amendments to the General Fund: <br /> 1) increase the operating appropriations in the Library, Recreation, and <br /> Cultural Services Department by $89,500 and 1.5 FTE for an <br /> intergenerational volunteer outreach program and decrease the Measure 50 <br /> Reserve by a like amount; 2) increase the operating appropriation in the <br /> Library, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department by $30,000 and .5 <br /> FTE for a special events outreach program and decrease the Measure 50 <br /> Reserve by a like amount; and 3) increase the operating appropriations in the <br /> Library, Recreation, and Cultural Services Department by $31,000 and .5 <br /> FTE to partially restore senior centers funding and decrease the Measure 50 <br /> Reserve by a like amount. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fart moved, seconded by Mr. Lee, to amend the motion to increase the <br /> operating appropriation in the Planning and Development Department by <br /> $55,700 to fund for the continuation of the Emergency Interfaith Shelter, and <br /> to decrease the Ballot Measure 50 Transition Reserve by a like amount. <br /> <br />Mr. Fart said that the funding represented a full year of operating costs for the extended <br />programming that the council had already funded for one-half a year. The funding would allow <br />the program to serve an additional 60 families during the year, and would leverage private money <br />from local churches that chose to participate. Mr. Fart said that because of the added funding <br />approved by the council six months ago, St. Vincent de Paul, the program sponsor, volunteered <br />to administer the church parking lot program. The funding would also provide portable toilets in <br />the 20 church parking lots now in use. Mr. Fart anticipated a 33 percent increase in the number <br />of people served if the funding were approved. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said that he was not prepared to support the amendment at this time. He pointed <br />out that the City had identified several service areas related to homelessness where a more <br />comprehensive examination was warranted. He cited dispute resolution and mediation services <br />as examples, adding that the council had not decided what to do with the camping ordinance in <br />the future. Mr. Meisner believed it was premature to approve funding for the program for an <br />entire year until the council had the opportunity to decide on the scope of its programs for the <br />homeless. He suggested that the issue be deferred to the first supplemental budget of the fiscal <br />year. As part of that future examination, he would like to see evidence of the private <br />contributions cited by Mr. Fart. <br />Mr. Meisner noted that nearly half the funding was for toilets. He said as the City looked at its <br />use of such facilities the council might wish to consider whether the City should purchase toilets <br />and manage that service itself rather than contract for it. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee said that the sum involved was about $50,000, a small part of the total budget. He said <br />that if Mr. Meisner wanted studies, the council had studies outlining a comprehensive approach <br />to homelessness that he would happy to forward to him. He said that the funding was urgent <br />because the fiscal year was coming to an end. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar said that he would probably support the motion but he was increasingly concerned <br />the council's use of the Measure 50 Transition Reserves. He asked about the balance of the <br />fund. Mr. Tollenaar did not think the City was doing a good job in intelligent system planning for <br />human services activities, which were growing because Eugene had become the funding agency <br />of first resort. The council needed to take a hard look at how such services were funded. It was <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 22, 1998 Page 6 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />