Laserfiche WebLink
the plan also called for periodic reviews to review locations and other issues. Ms. Nathanson <br />said the explanation was satisfactory and a good approach. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar expressed some concern that the report does not state the need, but rather jumps <br />right into the recommendations. He said stating the need was "devastatingly urgent" and needed <br />to be explained to the public for its support. He questioned the need for a permanent library <br />board, saying it was not consistent with approved council policy, adding there might be a need for <br />advisory groups that would sunset in two years, particularly for the branches. Mr. Tollenaar said <br />he also questioned the assumptions made around parking, given the library's location next to the <br />Lane Transit District's (LTD) station downtown. <br /> <br />Ms. Aspinwall-Lamberts responded that the committee did not get into design issues such as <br />parking. With regard to the advisory committee, she said the committee believed library services <br />would be more complex with branches and it would be most helpful and advisable to have an <br />ongoing citizen committee. Mr. Meisner added that the Library Board was supported by public <br />input. He added that public testimony insisted on having "free, safe parking." <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said parking was most often mentioned in her public contacts as a requirement for the <br />new library downtown. She noted that library visits were usually scheduled around other errands <br />or with their children and public transportation was impractical for those types of trips. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said he is often asked if the project can stay within budget, with concern that any <br />shortfall come from private contributions and not taxes. He said if there is no public support for <br />the operating levy and branches, he would like to delay construction until operating funds are <br />secure or identified. Mayor Torrey recalled the council process thus far and said it had been a <br />very good one. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov expressed appreciation for the committee's work. She said she did not <br />share Mayor Torrey's concern with operating funds because there were operating resources for <br />the current library that could go toward the new library system so even absent new money, there <br />should be enough for enhanced services. She explained that she believed the City would be <br />able to operate the new system "smarter, better, more efficiently." Ms. Swanson Gribskov asked <br />what would happen if the $5 million is not raised. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said if the people vote the operating levy down, the council still has the ability to <br />identify other operating resources, but he was concerned that the exact cost for a new library had <br />not yet been developed and would escalate if put off for another two years. He said he hoped for <br />public confidence that the library would be built because they would than be more likely to <br />approve the operating levy. <br /> <br />Sue Cutsogeorge, Administrative Services, reported on funding options for: 1) a new library, yet <br />undesigned, estimated to cost about $25.5 million; 2) two branch libraries; and 3) enhancing <br />services at the main library. She explained that the $5.6 million funding gap between the <br />estimated $18 million available from urban renewal funds and from the $1.9 million included in <br />the local option levy for the new library would be met with private fund-raising. Total costs <br />estimated at $9.24 million over four years would be raised through a proposed four-year local <br />option levy--about $39.50 a year for the average taxpayer. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 22, 1998 Page 2 <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />