Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Lee said that he would work with staff and periodically update the council on the process. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson said she heard council support for education and coordination, but she <br />questioned whether the council supported the concept of providing direct assistance to others. <br />Mr. Johnson anticipated that any contingency plan developed would include setting aside money <br />for the unforeseen worst case scenario. <br /> <br />By consensus, the council directed Mr. Lee to proceed. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey left the meeting. Council President Fart assumed the chair. <br /> <br /> C. Work Session: Tree Issues <br /> <br />Public Works Department Director Christine Andersen introduced Johnny Medlin of the Public <br />Works Maintenance Division, Jerry Jacobson of the Planning Division, and Marsha Miller and <br />Dick Gassman of Building and Permit Services. She reminded the council that it had one work <br />session and one public hearing over the last twelve months on tree issues, primarily focused on <br />the City's private property tree permitting program. Ms. Andersen said that for the discussion <br />tonight, staff had provided background in the staff notes about adopted policies related to the <br />Urban Forestry Program. <br /> <br />Ms. Andersen provided background on the development and adoption of the Urban Forest <br />Management Plan. She referred the council to the 19 adopted policies contained in the plan and <br />wall charts highlighting some of the activities related to each policy. Ms. Andersen said the City <br />had focused its limited resources on those areas most crucial to the council. <br /> <br />Ms. Andersen reviewed regulatory activity associated with trees and development on private <br />property, and discussed proposed changes to streamline the private property permitting program <br />reestablished in fiscal year 1999 budget. <br /> <br />Ms. Andersen noted public concerns expressed in testimony regarding the integrity of the urban <br />forest and in particular areas along the ridge line and in the south hills. She referred the council <br />to a map illustrating the ridge line trail and setback, the city limits, and the urban growth <br />boundary. She said the hatch marked areas reflected already developed areas or areas in the <br />process of being developed. Unshaded areas reflected remaining developable areas containing <br />tree canopy that might be affected by future development activities. Staff had put primary effort <br />into maintaining the integrity of the tree canopy, planting more than 5,000 street trees to date <br />through the auspices of the NeighborWoods Program; she anticipated that in the future 3,000 <br />street trees would be planted annually under Neighborhoods and the Local Street Plan <br />requirement in areas with new development served by underground utilities, reducing the conflict <br />between trees and regular maintenance activities. <br /> <br />Ms. Andersen said that there continued to be strong community controversy about a relatively <br />small number of private tree removal activities in Eugene. She said that for staff to make a <br />recommendation to the council, it would be useful for staff to hear from the council what its <br />program goals were. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor believed that the Urban Forest Management Plan was largely advisory rather than <br />enforceable, and suggested that its provisions needed to be codified to be effective. She asked <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 12, 1998 Page 6 <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />