Laserfiche WebLink
A. Use of Force/Taser Policy Committee – Progress to Date <br />A new policy review committee was formed, separate from the policy screening team, to <br />focus on policies associated with police use of force. The committee’s first project was to <br />assist the department in developing a Taser policy to be used during a pilot project to test <br />deployment of this weapon as a new less lethal option. The committee was also charged with <br />updating the department’s existing use of force policies, using the Lexipol model policies as a <br />foundation for revisions. <br />The Use of Force/Taser policy committee received a packet of background materials on <br />electro-muscular control devices (e.g., Tasers) in February and in April, held its first meeting <br />to discuss the pilot project. After receivinga series of sampleTaser policies and the <br />department’s first policy draft, the committee was ready began its policy development work in <br />earnest. The original draft underwent significant revision over the next four meetings in <br />response to committee members’ suggestions for language they believed better reflected <br />community standards. Additional policy modifications were prompted by comments from the <br />ACLU and from staff as procedural decisions related to the pilot project were made. <br />th <br />At the June 18 meeting, the committee agreed that the draft policy was ready for wider <br />public dissemination. The draft included several ‘outstanding issues’ where committee <br />members had not yet come to consensus on preferred policy language. The committee felt <br />th <br />that these items were particularly ripe for public discussion and set a date of June 27 for a <br />public forum. <br />The committee further decided to structure the forum in a way that it believed would foster <br />dialogue and focus public commentary. The format included a general overview of the <br />committee’s work followed by a break-out into round table discussion areas with an <br />opportunity for participants to rotate through the topic areas. Four topics were identified for <br />roundtable discussion areas and topic experts were contacted to host each area as follows: <br />Medical/health risks – Dr. James McClelland, Oregon Cardiology and Dr. Rick <br />Lindquist, McKenzie Willamette ER; moderated by Commissioner Tamara Miller <br />Law enforcement – Lt. Scott Fellman and Sgt. Kevin McCormick; moderated by <br />Commissioner John Ahlen <br />Civil Liberties and Human Rights – Dave Fidanque and Claire Syrett, ACLU; <br />moderated by Commissioner Joe Alsup <br />Draft Taser Policy – facilitated by Commissioners John Brown and Charlie <br />Zennaché <br />Topic-specific handouts and the draft policy were available for review, while moderators <br />collected input on charts at each table. Comment cards were also provided for participants to <br />provide written input. About 50 people attended the forum and there was extensive media <br />coverage of the event. However, based on strong sentiments that the public expected an <br />opportunity to simple provide testimony on the topic, it was announced that Police <br />Commission would also hold an extended public comment period at its July 12meeting. <br />Page <br /> 5 of 8 <br />2007 Police Commission Annual Report <br />