Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes

Home Browse Search

impressed by the success that Lane County and Springfield had with other issues that were “maybe not as high a priority.” Commissioner Sorenson pointed out that the County had laid off 57 deputies. He said to say that Lane County was in deep trouble was an understatement. He commented that Springfield had built its own jail, which he considered “remarkable.” He felt that Eugene’s contributions to social services and corrections were good but ultimately the jurisdictions had to look after the taxpayers. He felt that if the board could show substantial public interest in a ballot measure, they would do so, but the ballot measures that they had mounted thus far had not passed. He averred that Springfield “had gone its own way with public safety” by building its own jail. He called this “further evidence of the divorce” that Springfield had obtained when it had been able to get out of the Eugene/Springfield metro planning process. Councilor Ralston was not interested in regionalized public safety. He felt that Springfield had been proactive and had citizen support for its jail project. He stated that the citizens of Springfield elected their councilors to represent them and to be responsible to them. For him it was a financial issue and Springfield did not have the resources to solve the County’s problem. He averred that Lane County residents needed to buy into the public safety system. Mayor Leiken noted that Springfield started planning for the jail in 2002 and passed its ballot measure in 2004. He said they had not profited, it was just an area they had looked at and worked on. He underscored that the bottom line was that Washington, D.C. had turned its back on Lane County and several other counties in Oregon. He averred that this area would need to “pull itself up by its bootstraps.” He noted that even when they were making plans for the jail it had appeared to them that the Save Our Rural Schools funding would continue, though it might “look a little different.” He thought Councilor Pryor was on the right track, but it was a funding issue. He pointed out that if it had not been for the levies that Springfield had passed and re-passed in 2006 the city would have roughly the same amount of police officers on the street as it did in 1980, though the town had grown by a third. Instead, he related, Springfield now had six or eight more officers. He underscored that Lane County had more officers in 1980 than it did today. He was not interested in forming more committees, but if the JEO wanted to focus on what the jurisdictions could do together to “take care of business” he was “in.” He indicated his support for potentially lobbying the State to eliminate the PSCC. He felt that Springfield was in a good position, noting that it had passed the Lane County measure. Additionally, he agreed with Commissioner Green: the criminals knew the system better than they did. Mr. Ruiz asked how staff could best support the JEO. He asked if it would be helpful for staff to identify options for how to move the discussion forward. Councilor Bettman wanted to vote on that at the local level. Councilor Ralston concurred. Councilor Ballew underscored the need to be focused when putting ideas together so that they were targeted on jail, prosecution, and the hard-edged issues. Mayor Piercy commented that they should consider having a lobbying effort for Salem that was similar to the United Front lobbying trip to Washington, D.C. Commissioner Stewart thanked everyone for their comments and adjourned the Board of Commissioners. Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting of the Eugene City Council. MINUTES—Joint Elected Officials— July 15, 2008 Page 10 Lane Board of County Commissioners and Eugene and Springfield City Councils