Item 3: Resolution Authorizing HUD Section 108 Revenue Bonds

Home Browse Search

CC – February 26, 2007: Council approved the ordinance authorizing the use of the Section 108 as a financing tool. The non-emergency ordinance established the City’s general ability to borrow for Section 108 projects with the stipulation that individual projects be approved by council resolution following a public hearing. Ordinance Number 20376, Council Bill Number 4938 “An ordinance authorizing Section 108 Revenue Bonds.” Vote: Passed 7:1 (Opposed: Taylor). Memo – April 9, 2007: Sue Cutsogeorge informed council that the issue of a debt policy amendment th would be brought to council as a consent calendar item on May 14. CC – May 14, 2007: Council approved, on consent calendar, an amendment to the City’s debt policies regarding conduit financing. th Public Comment – June 20 to July 20, 2007: The 30-day public comment period started on June 20 th with an advertisement in the Register Guard. No public comments received as of July 17. CDBG-AC – July 10, 2007: The CDBG-AC met to review the individual project #1. They recommended “submittal of the individual project application to HUD subject to completion of public hearing and City Council approval of a project specific resolution.” Vote: Passed 8:0 CC – July 16, 2007: Public hearing on the project to be funded from BEDI/HUD 108 funds. Two individuals spoke at the hearing. 4. Downtown Urban Renewal District July 1968: District originally created. The district plan has been amended four times: December 1968, November 1989, June 1998, and most recently in September 2004. Memo – April 12, 2007: Staff memo addressed the financial capacity of the Downtown Urban Renewal District and other tools to support downtown redevelopment. The necessity of a plan amendment was raised in connection with undertaking a large-scale redevelopment project. ERAC – April 19, 2007: ERAC viewed a presentation on the Downtown Urban Renewal District. ERAC unanimously recommended that the Downtown District Urban Renewal Plan be amended to increase the district’s financial capacity. CC & URA – April 25, 2007: Work session on the financial tools available to support downtown redevelopment. Staff alerted council to the necessity of amending the district plan to increase financial capacity. Public Workshop – April 30, 2007 : A public workshop was held to gather citizen input on the Beam and KWG concepts and the selection options being considered by the URA. The necessity of increasing the “maximum indebtedness” in the district was presented to the workshop attendees. th The results of the workshop were included in the council packet for the May 9 meeting. URA – May 29, 2007: The URA also began the process for making a substantial amendment to the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan. The Agency passed the following motion: Move to forward to the Planning Commission and overlapping taxing districts the proposed amendments to the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan, consistent with the draft plan and report