Laserfiche WebLink
In response to another question from Ms. Taylor, Mr. Carlson explained that reasons that a <br />Transportation Utility Fee was proposed for consideration was that it provided locally controlled <br />revenue, could be adopted without voter approval, and was more possible to control locally than <br />a vehicle registration fee or gasoline tax. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Ms. Weeldreyer, Mr. Carlson explained that LCOG monitored all <br />legislation and regulation proposals regarding gasoline taxes. He reviewed State proposals <br />currently under consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Morrisette stated that he believed the meeting had been valuable. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully Submitted, <br /> <br />James R. Johnson <br />City Manager Pro Tern <br /> <br />(Recorded by Dan Lindstrom) <br />R:~1998~Adm Services~CIS~JEO~jeo980428. wpd <br /> <br />MINUTES--Metropolitan Joint Elected Officials April 28, 1998 Page 9 <br /> <br /> <br />