Laserfiche WebLink
suggested that it would be helpful to develop a cap or maximum for SDCs for affordable housing. <br />She said she agreed that regional parks should be included in SDCs. <br /> <br />Mr. Tollenaar said he believed resolving issues related to the Policy 14 requirement that <br />development pay the full cost of extending infrastructure and services was most pressing. He <br />suggested that the PWRAC should develop proposals for SDCs to cover the cost of <br />infrastructure while allowing for reductions for redevelopment, in-fill, and mixed-use projects. He <br />said he agreed that Policy 14 was in conflict with Policy 8 and would not be able to be resolved. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee said that the issues being discussed were also being dealt with on the state level. He <br />said he supported requiring commercial and industrial development to pay park SDCs. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said that he agreed promotion of affordable housing would be impacted by <br />constraints imposed by the Urban Growth Boundary. He said he would like to have a chart <br />showing the location of SDCs uses provided to the council. Mr. Lyle said that such a map was <br />being developed. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey said that he agreed with Mr. Tollenaar regarding the importance of resolving issues <br />related to infrastructure. <br /> <br />Mr. Fart stated that he would like additional information regarding the cost of re-development in <br />comparison to that of new development. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey determined there was agreement that the PWRAC should review and recommend <br />how SDCs might be best used to address in-fill redevelopment goals outlined in Policy 14. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 23, 1998 Page 8 <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />