Laserfiche WebLink
<br />through-traffic in 2000. This is an existing condition that is not altered by the proposed <br />modified traffic diverter. <br /> <br />1.4.5 Presence of certain characteristics such as bike routes, bus routes, postal deliveries, <br />service deliveries, emergency vehicle access, pedestrian access, or access to private <br />property. The proposed modified traffic diverter will retain the existing access that allows <br />people riding bicycles to pass through. There are no bus routes on Fairway Loop. The existing <br />traffic diverter requires postal deliveries, service deliveries, and emergency vehicle access to <br />use Oakway Road to access the existing residential area to the north and to use Southwood <br />Lane to access the existing residential development to the south. People walking may continue <br />to use Fairway Loop. The proposed modified traffic diverter, however, will allow full access to <br />the abutting private property on the east side of Fairway Loop. Provision of this access was not <br />provided when the diverter system was originally designed. The diverter system was installed <br />to allow local traffic the use of Fairway Loop, without allowing the cut-through traffic from <br />vehicles with neither an origination or destination in the neighborhood. If the diverter is not <br />modified, the intent to allow those trips that originate or end in the neighborhood, which <br />prompted the request for installation, will be frustrated with respect to the property that is <br />located on the east side of Fairview Loop. See R-5040TD-C-1.7. <br />The Traffic Engineer addressed the general considerations at EC 5.055 when the partial closure, and <br />resulting traffic diverter on Fairway, were initially authorized in 2000 by Administrative Order No. 58- <br />00-06 (attached). The findings that justified the partial closure of Fairway Loop at that time are still <br />valid, but the proposed diverter system that carried out that partial closure should be modified to better <br />address the considerations at EC 5.055 with respect to the undeveloped land adjacent to Fairway Loop. <br />Specifically, the 2000 Traffic Engineer’s findings regarding efficient use of the public way and use of <br />abutting property did not adequately consider the access needs of the undeveloped property on Fairway <br />Loop when considering the location of the diverter under EC 5.055(d), (g) and (i). <br /> <br />The proposed modification better addresses the considerations referenced in the Traffic Diverter <br />Modification Rule and at EC 5.055 while still addressing the ultimate purpose for the partial closure. <br />Therefore, the proposed modification is granted. <br /> <br />Additional Notes <br /> <br /> A copy of the findings adopted with Administrative Order No. 58-00-06, which is repealed by <br />this Order, is attached to this Exhibit A for reference only. <br /> <br /> The study provided by the applicant provides a sufficient basis for review of the proposed <br />modification; an additional study was not needed to evaluate the effectiveness of the traffic <br />diverter. <br /> <br /> The Traffic Engineer determined that a public hearing was warranted to consider the proposed <br />modification. On September 8, 2020, the City mailed notice of a virtual public hearing to all <br />addresses within the study area - bound by Southwood Lane on the south, Fairway Loop on the <br />west (including residential development accessing Fairway Loop from the west), Fairway Loop <br />on the north (including residential development with frontage on Fairway Loop), and Oakway <br />Road on the east. Additional notification was sent via email to the Cal Young Neighborhood