Laserfiche WebLink
Emily Golden-Fields, 37 Washington Street, stated that she was a student and community <br />member and was aware of complaints about police behavior. She said she believed there was a <br />need for a Police Commission to provide citizen input and resolve complaints. She said she was <br />aware that such a body in other cities operated successfully. She encouraged student <br />participation in its formation. <br /> <br />Byron Stone, 2635 Calgary Street, said that he was concerned that the Police Commission <br />succeed because his family had recently been harassed by police actions. He said he believed a <br />police review board was also needed. <br /> <br />Misha Seymour, 1313 Lincoln Street #306, suggested that laws and police actions did not <br />always coincide and that a police external review board was needed. He said he hoped the new <br />City Council would establish such a body. He observed that allegations about unfairness in <br />Eugene were never raised in the past. He suggested that street benches should be provided <br />near the University. He said he favored establishment of a citizen police review board over <br />establishment of a Police Commission. <br /> <br />Polly Nelson, Post Office Box 50426, stated that she represented the American Civil Liberties <br />Union of Oregon. She said her organization encouraged approval and appointment of a Police <br />Commission. She suggested the commission could be more important than an incident review <br />board because it had been determined that the June 1, 1997, incident had involved no violation <br />of police policies. She said she was concerned that a way be developed to build consensus to <br />change police policies. <br /> <br />Elaine Green, 803 Sundance Road, said that she supported the current wording of the proposed <br />ordinance because it was within the spirit of the recommendation of the External Review <br />Advisory Committee and met the needs of the Police Department. She reviewed the work of the <br />committee and said that half of concerns it had received had been about the actions of individual <br />officers and half about police policies. She recommended that the ordinance be adopted <br />because it was good community policing and good public policy. <br /> <br />Gordie Albi, 550 East 40th Avenue, stated that he supported the remarks of Elaine Green. He <br />said that during his efforts to pass the ballot measure establishing a citizen police review board <br />he had learned that most citizens felt such a process was already in place. He suggested that a <br />Police Commission could create stimulus for broadening police training and that new realities <br />called for a Police Commission and police review. <br /> <br />Martin Champion, 1430 Willamette Street #597, stated that it was important for the council to <br />make clear that the proposed Police Commission was different than the citizen police review <br />board presented to voters. He said he believed the need for policy review was clear and that <br />important dialogue needed to take place between police and the community. He said he hoped <br />the commission would provide a place for interpretation of various police policies. <br /> <br />Matthew Rutman, 1648 Alder Street #23, stated that he was a student at the University of <br />Oregon and that he supported establishment of the Police Commission. He described his <br />experience of what he described as police harassment. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 23, 1998 Page 7 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />