Laserfiche WebLink
referred to in his analysis would be achieved in its absence and in the absence of the initial <br />criteria. He believed that the use of the modifiers high, medium, and Iow forced the decision- <br />makers to be more explicit as to why they were recommending one designation over another. <br />Mr. Tollenaar did not want to eliminate the preamble. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson suggested the council might want to take a subcommittee approach in conjunction <br />with the County as it had to the Glenwood issue in conjunction with Springfield. <br /> <br />Ms. Swanson Gribskov said that the process was an ongoing and iterative one. She said it <br />should proceed and the council should continue to work toward a positive resolution with the <br />County. She favored consideration of Alternative 2. <br /> <br />Mr. Laue said the council should continue to try to work toward a mutually satisfying resolution <br />with the County for the sake of the wetlands involved. He urged the council to come to a mutual <br />understanding with the board about the next steps involved. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor was not prepared to give up on joint adoption of the plan but said the council should <br />hold public hearings on the alternatives prepared by Mr. Gordon. She did not favor the approach <br />suggested by Mr. Johnson. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee also supported having public input into Alternative 2. He said that continuing to work <br />with the County was important to him, although he shared some of Mr. Meisner's pessimism. <br /> <br />Mr. Torrey said that the subcommittee approach used by the City to negotiate the enterprise zone <br />changes with the County cut weeks off the process while allowing each councilor to provide <br />input. He suggested that it would be appropriate to let the County know soon if the council <br />supported that approach so the appropriate representatives could be appointed to the <br />subcommittee to resolve the alternative that would be presented to the public. Mr. Torrey <br />suggested that Ms. Nathanson would be an appropriate representative to that subcommittee <br />because of the wetlands location in her ward. Mr. Tollenaar also agreed to serve on the <br />subcommittee. Mr. Torrey said that the council would be consulted before the subcommittee was <br />formed. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said that there would be several changes in the composition of the board and she did <br />not think the council should start negotiations with the County prior to 1999. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 1:42 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Jim Johnson <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by KimberlyYoung) <br />R:~RCHIVES~1998~dm Se~ices~CIS~Counc#~cc981~ 25m~. wpd <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 25, 1998 Page 13 <br /> 11:30 a.m. <br /> <br /> <br />