Laserfiche WebLink
belonged to the property owner, not the City. So the question was, did the City own fee title or <br />did it have an easement for right-of-way purposes; the issue went to the question of value. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said he was impressed with the residents' willingness to become involved and to <br />work with the applicant on a solution that satisfied all parties. He understood the objections <br />raised in Ms. Davies' letter but said that the plan did not bar or prevent local truck traffic; it merely <br />ensured truck drivers would be more careful traveling a residential street. He noted that his <br />support and the support of residents was contingent upon approval of a traffic improvement plan <br />consistent with the goals expressed by residents. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson noted the concerns expressed by Ralph Walker regarding the impact of the traffic <br />improvement plan on his property and asked how those concerns were addressed. Mr. Kullby <br />said that Mr. Walker owned residentially zoned and industrially zoned property in the area, all of <br />which was developed in housing. He was losing on-street parking spaces as a result of the plan. <br />The plan recognized the loss of on-street parking as an impact to Mr. Walker and other adjacent <br />properties. As a result of property owner objections, a choker initially proposed at the October <br />29, 1998, neighborhood meeting had been eliminated. Regarding the issue of storm water <br />drainage, Mr. Kullby said that Gary McNeel of Public Works Engineering suggested that weep <br />holes could be installed through the curb extension. Mr. Walker's letter expressed concern that <br />the plan would preclude his property from being divided. Mr. Kullby responded that the code <br />allowed alley access lots, meaning Mr. Walker could subdivide his property and use the 3rd Place <br />alley as a public access. Mr. McNeel added that the business owners also wanted to see <br />diverters installed on 3rd Avenue to indicate to A&K Development drivers that they needed to <br />make a left turn; the diverter had been added to the plan. He said that staff believed the plan <br />was a compromise from what the residents were requesting at the pubilc hearing, i.e., <br />roundabouts at the West 4th Avenue and Taylor Street intersection, but the process got somewhat <br />polarized as time went on. <br /> <br /> Mr. Farr moved, seconded by Mr. Tollenaar, to direct staff to prepare <br /> ordinances that vacates the rights-of-way of the West 3rd Place alley located <br /> west of Almaden Street, and West 4th Avenue located west of Fillmore Street <br /> and east of Chambers Street with findings as specified by the council. Roll <br /> call vote; the motion passed unanimously, 7:1; Mr. Laue voting no. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Jim Johnson <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by KimberlyYoung) <br />R:~RCHIVES~1998~dm Se~ices~CIS~Councfl~cc98120 7ml. wpd <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council December 7, 1998 Page 10 <br />5:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />