Ord. 20646 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

EXHIBIT C The applicant shall seek, and the City shall consider such approval using the City's Type II land use application procedure. With the inclusion of the trip cap condition, the proposal meets the requirements of Statewide Based on these findings and condition, the proposal is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 12. Goal 13: Energy Conservation - To conserve energy. The proposed change to the Metro land use diagram will not amend or otherwise involve any land use regulations that implement this Goal. Therefore, Statewide Planning Goal 13 does not apply. Goal 14: Urbanization - To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. The Metro Plan diagram amendment does transition of land from rural to urban uses. Based on this finding, Statewide Planning Goal 14 does not apply. Goal 15: Willamette River Greenway - To protect, conserve, enhance and maintain the natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, economic and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River as the Willamette River Greenway. The Metro Plan Amendment does not contain any changes that affect the Willamette River Greenway regulations, nor is the subject property located within the adopted Willamette Greenway boundary. Based on this finding, Statewide Planning Goal 15 does not apply. Goals 16 19: Estuarine Resources; Coastal Shorelands; Beaches and Dunes; and Ocean Resources There are no estuarine, beach and dune, coastal, or ocean resources related to subject property. Based on this finding, Statewide Planning Goals 16 through 19 do not apply. Based on the findings above, the Metro Plan Amendment complies with the Statewide Planning Goals and the approval criterion at EC 9.7735(1) is met. EC 9.7735(2): The proposed amendment does not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. No policies within the Metro Plan appear to serve as mandatory approval criteria for this application, nor do any Metro Plan policies appear to be directly relevant to this site-specific Metro Plan Diagram amendment. Therefore, the proposed amendment does not present any conflict with Metro Plan policies nor make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. Based on these findings, this criterion is met. Findings Page 9 of 14 MA 20-3 / Z 20-10