My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 09/12/05 Mtg
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:24:35 PM
Creation date
9/7/2005 2:59:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/12/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />hood initiative, She averred that lwighborhoods and downtown hUi',ine~.,:=;e~;; \Vere very graktUl il,r the <br />offk~'1's. She fe1t the City had begun to make some progress on \vhat had been her persona! intent "\vhen <br />she pat this goal on the tabk. <br />M.s. Hettman calkd the list exhaastive, She as'bx1 that ev~~rything the organlzHt1on W<1~., already doing he <br />taken dT the J.l.st. She thought th,)re 8ho'nld b;:: di.iTerentiation hetwi...~1) neighborhfKH:is and n<:::ighb(')l'hood <br />assf!i..::iat1ons. When fDrH1ubting: the goal, she had neighborhoods in mind in terms of livahHity. She <br />helieved heaHhy ndghhorhoods to be tb;~ fundamental building blocks to a healthy eity. Sb:: recorn.. <br />mended bt;~ginningwith an overarching value thM explored how thiB livability (odd be preserved and <br />enl:wm.:C{L She ob~erved that things ,omch as density, inillt commen:ial development, and transportation. <br />pn)je;.;~ts had the (apacity to enhance or degrade a neighhorhood, <br />M.J". Pryor a:prreciatd the dTm1 that gone into the phm and agreed with wmments suggesting the plan <br />should he more focused. He remarked that wh.)H thir&Jng about neighborhoods and the City'~;; role in <br />them, he thought ~thout the people and the City'~ relationship and partnership \vith them. He [eft tb;~i;e <br />areas should be thc ones on which to {!JCllS. the most energy. He 1iked what was ~.,aid in the proposed plan <br />regarding public engagement and efforts to try tf} create greakr nutreachin th.) cotmnunity. He s~tid while <br />the general Pop\lla1ion of the neighborhoods should help to bring the initiative to fwitiun, the l:1(~ighbor- <br />hood as~;ociati.o!1s had an important role in getting those individuals involved. He wanted to work on <br />strategies to en~.;ure the City was in contact with e'leryone.He corn.mented that it 'Nas a "'struggle" to hnd <br />out wh;;tt happy pmpk: think hecause. usuaJ1y the eounci] only heard from.1.mhappy people and quality <br />infonn<1tion wGald indude hoth. He agreed that disagreement~ 'were he,'llthy. but averred dn"!t t.he purpose <br />f r j j' H fk d '1 f '1 ,. <br />o . ( 1.&1.gR~ement "',v.as to reac 1 a r~~so .H1l.0:n.,'.c t'.) ,t K o;.;~lS on 8ervtce I; t;~Uvery, <br />.Mr.Poli.ng thanked staff for all the time and dfort that had gone i.nto tht~ pIan. He ;;igreed. th<'l.t the plan <br />wai; tno broad and Hlmost overwhelming. He concurred with Mr. Pryor's ~.;entiments regarding invoive- <br />rnent of neighborhood resident~;; thmn~/;,ndghbod1ood a::;sGcbtkms in order to get morz~ people in the city <br />involved with what w.as going on. <br />Mayor Pien:;y said the dmsity of the inforrmtion W<lS an interesting way for the wu.ndt ~md staff to ~.;ee aU <br />of the rebtionshipi; benveen the things that happen in the ndghhorhouds and aU of the things the City did <br />to reach om into the neighborhoods, She supported helping the ndghborhood orgmlizations be as .'strong <br />as the City could <1~.,:=;i~.,t them in heing" so that they fed empowered to be a ::;ignificant part of the di.-o"Cision- <br />making proo;:ss in the. community. Sbx; hoped ttw City eoukl provid.e trainings fiJf neighborhood <br />organizations hecau.se it wa::; wmeti.mes diffkult to run a meeting w that. people with different point::; of <br />view felt thx7 W<;Te partkipating and being heard. <br />Reg:an:llng div~;Tshy, l\--1ayor Piercy thought the City should talk with neighborhood. associations .ahout <br />stmkgks to engage more people and what they might do to help bring more people in, She (jbselved that <br />the Msodations wa.ntt)d memh.)rship t;;! be repJ'Csentativt: nfneighhorhood (hv;;::~rsity. She opined that ;;;o:me <br />of the neighborhood association:..; had become too big. <br />1\4ayol Piercy called fhr a ~;;ec{md mund of council questioni; and I;;om.rnents, <br />lYk Kelly agreed that neighbor.hood livability was critical. He averred that if the initiative \Ilorked the <br />way it \Ilas intended, it \vnuld i;Lrengthen the neighborhood i.\8s;;!cbtions byini,)rc;),singinvolvnnen.t, <br />Mr. KeHy recommended that Action Item 1, the devdop-ment of aNeighborhood~I:Klsed Community <br />Policing Strategy, involvc the participation of neighborhood a.ssnz:iations. <br />MINUTES....--E1..gt:ne City Coundl lS.1..gust In, 2005 Page 4 <br />Work Se;;;sion <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.