Laserfiche WebLink
<br />long-term residenc:y and home O\vnership.' She wished to see the phmse 'less contentiousness around <br />development applications' changed to "residents and neighborhoods suppo!"t devdopment applications,' <br />Ms, Bettman asked staff to revie\v a pmposal written by Joseph Cunningh~m1, <br />Ms. H(~ctman rem.arked that minimization of Cl:.mversiuns from residential us~~s to commercial nses had <br />remained unaddress(~d, <br />Mr. Papi commented that the ere was inten&d to have a greate. function than neighhcu"hood associa- <br />tions. He did ni)t s(~e that as a neighborhood goal. <br />My, Corey st.ated that the plan would be brought befixe the council for further (;()nsideratkm and adoption <br />at later dates, He felt neighborhood input would be app.opriate when the plan was aUgned more dosdy <br />with the co\mdl priorities, The cmmdl acknowledgz.>cl the plan should be brought back for further <br />consideration before soliciting tl.'mnal input from neighborhood w,sociations, <br />Me Kelly suggested th~lt staff send an email to the ndghborhood leaders explaining this fir::;t step in the <br />process, <br />It WORK SESSION; <br /> Programming of Surface Transportation l)rogramN"Urban Funds <br />City Manager Taylor stated that City .Engineer Mark Schoening was present to review the prqject listf{)f <br />funds to be progmmmed by the Metropnlitan Policy Committee (MPC), <br />Mr. Schoening reviewed the inf<mnation in the Agenda Item Summary (A1S) regarding the Programming <br />of Sur :face Tramportation Pmgram-Urlnltl Funds, He said the schedule h~(d been complicated by the air <br />quality assessment and the work of the (~itizen Advisory Committee (CAe), He explained that Attach~ <br />me-nt A Preservation twt! J10demiztflirm (md Phwlling andPmJect Development Pro]ectList delineated <br />the projects, <br />Mr. Schoening stated that t!:w modemln~tion project on Game Farm Road had already been budgeted-He <br />explained that a change in the funding source .equired that it be bwuf!)lt back ~f{).e the counciL He said, <br />if successluL the fedend llmds w'Quld replace syst(~ms devdopment charges (SDCs) and would fill the gap <br />where other fbnds had previowdy been identified, thought t{l come from Springfkld and/or the County. <br />He noted tbat the project had been identified in part because ot'the synergy with the County's project on <br />Game .Farm Road, the City's project to extend Chad Drive, and the Oregon Department of Transpoli.ation <br />(ODOT) pn~ject to replace the bddge.s over Game Farm Road. <br />Mr. Schoening reviewed the preservation proj(~cts on tl:w Hst, He explained that the transportation <br />planning a{tivity continued the past practice of securing funds fur such activities \vhich he predicted <br />wouid become c.itical a:3 the Cnunty had, in its .Fiscal Year (FY) 200& Capita; Plan, discontinued the <br />City/County partnership money, appmximatdy $1 rninion, He stated th~tt the iist indicated the prqjeds <br />the City wanted to submit appiic~ttkms for, He repl)rted that thelY.rPC "Vyonld review the recomme-ndations <br />of the Transportation Planlllng Committe-~ {TPC) on August 11; the application period be.gan then and <br />would. end Oll August 2:L <br />Mavor Piercy called on the councii fo. questions and conunentiL <br />~ ~ ^ <br />MINUTES-Eugene City Council August 10, 2005 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br />____.....u......................____ ................... . . . ..... .................................................................----........... ......... .... . . .... .. .........................------...------........................... <br /> ... . ... <br />