Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Both the MUPTE statutes and the Eugene Code provide that the multiple-unit tax exemption does not <br />include the land or any improvements that are not a part of the multiple-unit housing, but may include <br />parking constructed as part of the multiple-unit housing construction, addition or conversion. (See ORS <br />307.612 and E.C. 2.947(6)). Pursuant to the statutes and Code, the City already collects tax on the land <br />and improvements, other than the multiple-unit housing, for the period of the tax exemption. No change <br />to the Code is necessary to achieve that result. <br /> <br />6) Please provide one map that shows the boundary as the expansion area along 99 and the NW <br />expressway combined with the proposed contracted boundary deleting the WUN (attachment B-4.) <br />One map delineating the Above configuration would make it easier for the discussion and <br />subsequent motion to adopt. <br /> <br />Response: <br />The map is provided in the attachments <br /> <br />7) An opportunity site is already a site that the city will be allowing higher densities and that is <br />considered an incentive. My original version of the proposal used the incentive of the up zoning to <br />require additional design standards and compatibility elements from the developer. This criterion <br />provides an automatic 10 year tax break for just for building in the zone Which undermines any <br />negotiating power on the part of the city or neighborhoods. Plus, we don't even know what op siting <br />will look like after it has been through the process. Please provide language to delete this criterion. <br />It functionally expands the MUPTE boundary to - wherever! <br /> <br />Response: <br />The use of MUPTE to encourage housing on Opportunity Sites is an option that can be deleted if Council <br />wishes to. The definition of an Opportunity Site will occur in the future. To receive a MUPTE the site <br />would still have to be located in the MUPTE boundary area and would not expand the district. <br /> <br /> <br />8) Language to change "endeavors to obtain certify" to "obtain certification" <br />for the LEED criterion. <br /> <br />Response: <br />Actual LEED certification takes place after construction is complete. A MUPTE must be granted prior to <br />construction. Requiring certification at the time of MUPTE approval is not possible. <br /> <br />9) Under Mixed Income, what is the number for 60% of median income? What median are you <br />using and what is the number and what is 60% of it? I have asked this question twice, in response I <br />received a chart with multiple medians, but this criteria uses only one. Also, if you are using the <br />median for Lane Co's very low income standard (I wish) then it should be stated under #3; what <br />ever median you are using needs to be identified in this section. <br /> <br />Response: <br />The section of the document has been edited to clarify that the area income calculation is provided <br />annually by HUD based on household size. ( HUD Median income guidelines are based on household <br />size.) For the federal HOME program very-low-income is defined both at 50% of median and 60% of <br />median income for rental eligibility. In rental projects with five or more HOME-assisted units 20% must <br />be available to households at 50% of median income. This is known as “low HOME”. Overall, 90% of <br />Z:\CMO\2008 Council Agendas\M081022\S081022B.docm <br />