Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Will Shaver, <br />3846 Peppertree, Ward 8, spoke in favor of the Downtown Code Amendments on his own <br />behalf, and not on behalf of the Sustainability Commission. He understood the dilemma brought forward <br />by Mr. Matthews wanting to reduce the amount of greenhouse gasses while promoting density, which were <br />values agreed on by many in the community. The past seven years had been very lean years from a <br />downtown development perspective. He proposed a new slogan for downtown, Downtown Eugene: Please <br />Drive Somewhere Else, which was what had happened. Development had occurred in the new downtown <br />Eugene on Coburg Road, and in the new Eugene in Springfield, and all around the borders that caused <br />people like Mr. Shaver to have to drive farther or ride his bike a ridiculous distance to procure goods and <br />services. The current 1.0 FAR had been ineffective in accomplishing the community’s goal of reducing <br />parking, based upon the pits and lack of building downtown. To reach the high density everyone sought, <br />there needed to be incremental changes. Parking spaces did not create revenue but allowed people to do <br />business. Eventually, as land values and density increased, parking spaces would be eliminated. In other <br />downtowns with high land values, parking was inefficient use of the land. <br /> <br />Lauri Segel, <br />642 Charnelton, Goal One Coalition, said the plan did not have a factual basis and she felt the <br />policies relied on were the wrong policies to be looking at and the right policies were not looked at. The <br />Downtown Plan should be predicated on other policies and Strategy F of the Downtown Plan related to <br />regulatory audits had not been followed. The proposal was based on non-quantitative information that <br />development did not pan out downtown. Going backwards and ignoring nodal development policies and <br />DLCD direction did not make sense. The TransPlan and Metro Plan had barely been touched on, and <br />adequate analysis had not been performed. She submitted written testimony for inclusion in the public <br />record. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Ms. Jerome said there was a written request to keep the public record open through June 30, and staff had <br />recommended this would work with the City Council’s timeline. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy noted consensus of the City Council to keep the public record open until June 30, 2008. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling noted six of the seven speakers who provided testimony to the Planning Commission <br />about increasing the number of allowable dogs to provide temporary housing for foster dogs were not City <br />residents. He asked for clarification on what change in the amendment meant for the number of allowable <br />dogs within the City limits. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked staff to respond to the quantitative TransPlan nodal requirements and reduction in <br />VMTs. She said housing was the key to redeveloping downtown and she wanted to see numbers. She <br />heard that rents were high downtown in comparison to other parts of the City and overall the property <br />values were brought down downtown by the west Broadway area because the much of the property was <br />owned by one entity that allowed the property to deteriorate for many years thus bringing down the values. <br />She asked to see a copy of the letter from DLCD referenced by several speakers tonight. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark had previously asked for the list of properties redeveloped the last seven years. He <br />concurred that much of downtown development was actually redevelopment. He asked for a comparison of <br />permitted dollars for both developed and redeveloped properties both in downtown and outside of <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 16, 2008 Page 16 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />