Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Zelenka indicated he would be offering an amendment after Councilor Bettman’s amendment was <br />voted on. He did not think that a basement that was unimproved in any way should be counted in the FAR. <br />He thought that if the basement was improved into retail or office spaces or underground parking it should <br />be counted. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion to amend failed, 6:2; councilors Bettman and Taylor voting in fa- <br />vor. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Bettman, moved to amend the ordinance to un- <br />delete what had been deleted in Section 1, and to undelete what was deleted in Section 3(d) <br />under 9.4530 and to include the words ‘and underground parking.’ Roll call vote; the mo- <br />tion to amend passed, 5:3; councilors Poling, Clark, and Solomon voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Poling, called for the question. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman said she had issues; there were some portions of the ordinance she could support and <br />some portions she could not support. She opposed calling the question. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the vote on calling the question was a tie, 4:4; councilors Pryor, Solomon, <br />Clark and Poling voting in favor and councilors Taylor, Ortiz, Bettman, and Zelenka voting <br />in opposition. Mayor Piercy voted in opposition and the motion failed. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to delete the proposed change to <br />EC 9.2161(5) in Section 2 of the Ordinance to retain the last sentence of that subsection. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman averred that without this amendment people would have an incentive to tear down <br />buildings and develop surface parking lots. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the vote on the amendment was a tie, 4:4; councilors Taylor, Ortiz, Bettman, <br />and Zelenka voting in favor and councilors Pryor, Solomon, Clark and Poling voting in op- <br />position. Mayor Piercy voted in favor and the amendment passed. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman, seconded by Councilor Taylor, moved to delete the proposed changes to <br />EC 9.4530(3)(a) in Section 3 of the Ordinance that reduce the FAR from 1.0 to 0.65 and <br />delete the references to Map 9.4510 and Figure 9.4530(3) in Section 4 of the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman remarked that this affected a specific boundary with the Transit-oriented District, TD/ <br />Zone. She felt that without her amendment the code changes would allow lower-density single-floor <br />development in the urban core. She said this had been cited in a letter from the Department of Land <br />Conservation and Development (DLCD), which had called this “suburban development densities in an urban <br />environment.” She averred that they had a limited amount of land in the urban core and could not afford not <br />to have it developed as densely as possible. She felt her amendment would help the urban core meet the <br />City’s sustainability goals, land use goals, and growth management policy goals. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka asked Ms. Laurence to respond to the letter from DLCD. Ms. Laurence stated that staff <br />had conversed with DLCD and pointed out areas in which their letter was not correct. She noted that DLCD <br />did not have regulations regarding what the City had to have as a certain FAR, though they wanted the City <br />to comply with growth management goals. She clarified that this change applied to the area outside the <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 14, 2008 Page 14 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />