My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 07/30/08 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2008
>
CC Minutes - 07/30/08 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:30:53 AM
Creation date
10/21/2008 3:01:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/30/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />McNutt Room—City Hall—777 Pearl Street <br />Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> July 30, 2008 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Bonny Bettman, Chris Pryor, Betty Taylor, Jennifer Solomon, George <br />Poling, Andrea Ortiz, Mike Clark, Alan Zelenka. <br /> <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the work session of the Eugene City Council to order. She adjourned <br />the meeting of the Eugene City Council and convened a meeting of the Eugene Urban Renewal Agency <br />(URA). <br /> <br /> <br />A. WORK SESSION: <br /> <br />th <br />Selection of Development Proposal for 10 and Charnelton Site <br /> <br /> <br />City Manager Jon Ruiz stated that both development proposals were strong. He emphasized that staff <br />would continue to work with whichever proposal was not selected by the council to determine if there were <br />other opportunities. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark, in the interests of full disclosure, declared that he had known Wally Graff of WG Development <br />for over 20 years and while they had on occasion discussed the possibility of a joint business venture, there <br />were no contracts or agreements in place. He wanted to clarify that in the event he had a future business <br />relationship with Mr. Graff. <br /> <br />Nan Laurence, Planning and Development Department, used a PowerPoint presentation to illustrate features <br />and compare the proposals under consideration from WG Development and Opus NWR Development. She <br />reviewed details of each proposal in terms of urban design and active uses and project feasibility and public <br />benefit. In conclusion, she said that both proposals added value and activity to downtown and contributed to <br />a quality urban environment. She said both projects were supported by the Downtown Plan and were <br />financially feasible, although the Opus proposal was stronger financially, and both supported the goal of a <br />revitalized downtown. She said the recommendation was to direct the agency director to enter into an <br />exclusive negotiation period not to exceed 90 days with either WG Development or Opus NWR Develop- <br />th <br />ment for the sale and development of the 10 and Charnelton site and return to the URA with terms of the <br />sale and development for approval. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman indicated she preferred the more urban-scale Opus design and had concerns with the design of <br />th <br />the WG project on 18 Avenue. She questioned whether there would be more design improvements given <br />economic projections. Ms. Laurence said design refinements would occur when a project had moved from <br />conceptual to schematic design. She felt both proposals presented preliminary designs and assumed that <br />further design refinements would be forthcoming, although that did not mean that additional funds would be <br />put into higher quality materials. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 30, 2008 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.