My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2008
>
CC Agenda - 10/27/08 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:27:09 PM
Creation date
10/24/2008 9:19:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
10/27/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Joint Elected Officials Meeting Minutes <br />September 15, 2008 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />Councilor Wylie said they were in the middle of an election process. She asked what would happen <br />if a new set of politicians came into positions in January of 2009 that didn’t want the WEP <br />removed, and how that would affect the planning process. <br /> <br />Mr. Boyatt said our land use effort looking to 2013 and transportation system planning would keep <br />moving. <br /> <br />Mr. Inerfeld said this was a five year or longer work plan so would go through several possible <br />changes in elected officials. This tied in other work that was currently in place. He gave exampled. <br />One of the requirements was to make our local transportation plans consistent with the RTP and <br />the WEP was already removed from that. From Eugene’s perspective it was more a question of <br />when they would remove the WEP, not whether or not it would be removed. He noted that the City <br />of Eugene had initiated the amendments to remove the WEP, but it would not be removed until <br />both the Eugene Council and Lane County Board of Commissioners took action to remove it. That <br />was targeted for the first quarter of 2009 in the work plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fleenor referred to Councilor Wylie’s comments regarding changes in electors in the <br />near future and Commissioner Sorenson’s suggestion for one-year check-ins on the work plan. He <br />said a recommendation could be to approve this plan for 6 years, with annual reviews to make sure <br />benchmarks were met, co-adoption issues addressed, and issues regarding political changes <br />addressed. That could offer some control on a year to year basis. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz thanked Springfield for hosting today’s meeting. She said she appreciated that <br />staff wanted the plan to remain flexible. When the community spoke to her, she tried to fight for <br />their values as she expected other elected officials did. She respected others goals and priorities and <br />asked for the same. She noted that the WEP was being removed, but something did need to be done <br />in that area of town as it affected the whole County. She hoped that when the collaborative group <br />that Mayor Piercy put forth brought their ideas to the table, the City of Eugene could move <br />forward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sorenson said several staff had mentioned working with LCOG on the modeling. He <br />asked where funding came from for LCOG and how much staff energy they were putting into the <br />six-year effort. <br /> <br />Mr. Boyatt said LCOG was funded by federal pass-through dollars from ODOT, and by the <br />authorization of STP-U (“urban”) funds through the MPC. LCOG staff concurred. There was a <br />combination of options working with LCOG. All of the model work LCOG did for the federal plan <br />should have benefit to development of our local and regional plan as they overlapped. LCOG as the <br />MPO had some prohibition on spending of those dollars. Some of the money the cities and county <br />had identified for these projects could be used for some outside modeling. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sorenson discussed rural reserves. He asked what the current work plan was for <br />rural reserves. He didn’t want that to stop in order to implement this policy. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dwyer said a rural reserve policy was not limited to the metro area. <br /> <br />Ms. Barry said their policy decisions on rural reserves had been with the land management division <br />and she was aware of those. This work program would not preclude them from forming a policy on <br />rural reserves. She would continue to keep in contact with that division regarding that policy. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.