Laserfiche WebLink
City of Eugene Legislative Policies for 2009 Oregon Legislative Session <br /> <br />C3. Deference to Voluntary Negotiations <br /> <br /> <br />?Eugene supports the resolution of employment disputes through voluntary agreement <br />between the parties over procedures which impose settlements by a third party. <br /> <br />C4. Installation of Electrical Equipment <br /> <br /> <br />?Eugene supports expanding the existing exemption afforded to cable television companies <br />from electrical permit and licensing requirements to include all forms of communications <br />cable (e.g., coaxial and fiber optic). These types of installations do not require the <br />knowledge, skills and abilities represented by a commercial electrician's license. Cities <br />should not be required to pay the associated fees and expenses of using licensed electricians <br />to install telephone and computer cable and equipment. These requirements do not result in <br />improved personnel or building safety. <br /> <br /> <br />D. LIQUOR LICENSING <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />?Eugene supports providing local governments with presumptive effect regarding the <br />issuance of liquor licenses. <br /> <br />To sustain safe, livable neighborhoods, local government recommendations regarding the issuance <br />of liquor licenses should have greater weight when the Oregon Liquor Control Commission acts on <br />license applications. Adverse recommendations by local governments should have “presumptive” <br />effect, meaning that a liquor license applicant would have to show good cause to overcome an <br />adverse recommendation from a city. <br /> <br />Prior to 1988, adverse local government recommendations regarding issuance of liquor licenses did <br />have a presumptive effect. In 1988, the Attorney General issued an opinion stating that OLCC <br />licensing criteria concerning a local governing body endorsement was invalid; that by giving <br />presumptive effect to adverse local government recommendations, the commission was delegating <br />its licensing authority to local governments unlawfully. <br /> <br />Creating (or re-establishing) a presumption against a license when an unfavorable recommendation <br />is forwarded by a local jurisdiction should be pursued. Such a change in the statutes would allow <br />local governing bodies a greater role in the licensing process. Local recommendations would carry <br />greater weight, while OLCC would play more of a reviewing role and would maintain statewide <br />criteria, thus maintaining consistency in licensing matters across the state. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />32 <br /> <br /> <br />