My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 5335
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2021 No. 5315-5339
>
Resolution No. 5335
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2021 12:09:05 PM
Creation date
11/9/2021 12:04:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
11/8/2021
Document_Number
5335
CMO_Effective_Date
11/8/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Exhibit C <br />AM Planning Director's Findings and Recommendation: <br />Annexation Request for MULLER, JOSEPH <br />Application Submitted: July 9, 2021 <br />Applicant: Joseph William Muller Jr. <br />Property Included in Annexation Request: Tax Lot 03900 of Assessor's Map 17-03-08-23 <br />Zoning: AG Agricultural Land with an /UL Urbanizable Land Overlay <br />Location: 3840 Gilham Road <br />Lead City Staff: Althea Sullivan, Senior Planner, City of Eugene Planning Division, 541-682-5485 <br />Based on the information provided by the applicant, the City has determined that this request complies <br />with Eugene Code /E[1Section 9.78USAnnexation -Applicability. As such, itissubject 10review and <br />approval in accordance with the requirements, application criteria and procedures of EC 9.7800 through <br />9.7835. The applicable approval criteria are presented below in bold typeface with findings and <br />conclusions following each. <br />EC 9.7825(l) The land proposed to be annexed is within the city's urban growth boundary and is: <br />(a) Contiguous to the city limits; or <br />(b) Separated from the city only by a public right of way or a stream, bay, lake or other <br />body of water. <br />Complies <br />Findings: The annexation area is within the City's urban growth boundary (UGB) and is <br />contiguous to City limits along the property's north, west, and south boundaries, <br />M <br />n <br />YES <br />NO <br />consistent with subsection (a). <br />EC 9.7825(2) The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in <br />any applicable refinement plans. <br />Complies <br />Findings: Several policies from the.Metro Plan provide support for this annexation by <br />encouraging compact urban growth to achieve efficient use of land and urban service <br />M <br />n <br />YES <br />NO <br />provisions within the UGB, including the following policies from the Growth <br />Management section (in italic text): <br />Policy 8. Land within the UGB may be convertedfirom urbanizable to urban only <br />through annexation to a city when it is found that: <br />a. A minimum level of key urban facilities and services can be provided to the <br />area in an orderly and efficient manner. <br />b. There will be a logical area and time within which to deliver urban services <br />andfacilities. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban shall also be <br />consistent with the Metro Plan. (page 11-C-4) <br />PolicylO. Annexation to a city through normal processes shall continue to be the <br />highest priority. (page 11-C-5). <br />MULLER, JOSEPH (A 21-10) October 2021 Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.