Laserfiche WebLink
infill standards exceeded “every metro, city, and local density benchmark.” He felt the group kept its <br />promise to aid in the work and expressed hope that the work would be of value to the council and the <br />Planning Commission in discussions of Multi-Use Centers. He thanked the council for its efforts to work <br />toward the well-being of the entire community. <br /> <br />Bruce Blonigen <br />, 1039 Taylor Street, spoke in tandem with Mr. Conte. Regarding neighborhood design <br />standards, he underscored that as a professor of economics at the University of Oregon, he believed in the <br />power of market forces. He said the compelling argument based on the power of the market was the notion <br />that the way to encourage compact residential neighborhoods in the core of the cities was to make them <br />attractive places to live. He asserted that no amount of “hand-wringing” would stop pressure on the urban <br />growth boundary (UGB) should those neighborhoods not be attractive relative to dwellings on the periphery. <br />He observed that in his neighborhood, the current zoning standards were allowing the degradation of core <br />neighborhoods, making them less attractive. He pointed out that some residents of his neighborhood left <br />because of just such elements, noting that an ugly multi-unit dwelling had been constructed next to his <br />house. He remarked that the housing market was not so simple as to equate one unit of infill with one less <br />unit of sprawl. He averred that in order to make the infill unit preferential, it needed to have a greater <br />appeal. He suggested that the design standards developed by CAFHN went a long way to ensure new <br />development would be compatible with core neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Mr. Blonigen lauded his experience with CAFHN. He shared that he and his wife participated in many <br />meetings and the group dedicated many hours to come up with detailed analyses and solutions, much based <br />on decades of residence in the neighborhood. He asked the City Council to consider the recommendations of <br />CAFHN as it considered the Chambers Multi-Use Center. <br /> <br />Phillip Carroll <br />, 1054 Van Buren Street, spoke as a resident of the Jefferson/Westside Neighborhood and a <br />representative of the Eugene Tree Foundation. He said that during the Chambers Neighborhood Revisited <br />(CNR) process, the urban forest was frequently referred to citizens because they recognized the value of the <br />landscape. He underscored that one goal of the CNR process was to promote density and infill that was <br />compatible with existing neighborhood character. He averred that the urban forest was a component of said <br />character and the successful function of the neighborhood. He stated that the landscape was due to the <br />health and diversity of the area, which depended on sufficiently large areas of contiguous plantable soil, <br />especially those formed by neighboring back yards. He said such yards provided area residents with the <br />opportunity to participate in the creation of the urban forest and the stewardship of the neighborhood. He <br />felt that the construction of infill that was out of scale with the rest of the neighborhood would chop up <br />planting areas and create challenges to the landscape. He commented that a healthy urban forest was not the <br />enemy of density. He cited an experience he had living in a row house in San Francisco in which his <br />backyard supported a variety of plantings, as did all of the backyards in that neighborhood. He asked the <br />council to think about these factors and to look closely at the proposals from CAFHN. He averred that <br />contributing to the desirability and quality of downtown living would increase residency. <br /> <br />Ruth Phelps <br />, 5445 Donald Street, wished to bring to the attention of the City Council and residents of the <br />South Hills area that Station 5 no longer had an ambulance and that the Fire and Emergency Medical <br />Services (EMS) Department expected Station 1 to provide coverage. She maintained that this would impact <br />the four-minute response time the department aspired to because the other stations were too far away. She <br />noted that the other ambulance that was to cover the area was located at the fire station on Bailey Hill Road. <br />She clarified that the ambulance itself was still located at Station 5, but the crew was no longer there. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 18, 2005 Page 6 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br />