My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 07/25/05 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2005
>
CC Minutes - 07/25/05 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:30:46 AM
Creation date
9/14/2005 9:54:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. The Brookings Report; <br />7. The Portland Development Commission; <br />8. Eugene Renewal Agency; <br />9. The Broadway Place; and <br />10. The affordable housing program. <br /> <br />Mr. Herbert felt this information would provide a factual basis for a council discussion on how to proceed. <br />He submitted his testimony in writing. <br /> <br />Randy Prince <br />, PO Box 927, asked the council to reconsider its goal for having an acute care hospital built <br />in the “low-lying areas of Eugene.” He cited recent geologic findings by Brian Atwater that explained why <br />this area did not experience frequent earthquakes. Mr. Atwater, he said, determined that the area did not <br />experience small earthquakes, but was prone to large seismic events at a frequency of 300 to 800 years, with <br />the last one occurring in the year 1700. He noted the recent changes in public policy, such as more frequent <br />earthquake drills in the schools and the requirement that new construction be subjected to careful survey and <br />seismic standards. He pointed out that there was no requirement to force seismic retrofits of City Hall or <br />Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) dams. He underscored that land use decisions made in the present, such <br />as one to site a hospital along the river, would last more than the lifespan of such a building. He said it was <br />clear, looking at the Multi-Hazard Plan, the dams the ACOE built were below the standards a seismic event <br />of great magnitude would require. He felt the City was subject to inundations of 10 to 45 feet of water <br />should such an event occur. <br /> <br />Charles Biggs <br />, 540 Antelope Way, commended the Public Works Department Transportation Division for <br />its workshop on traffic calming for the Sorrel Way area. He felt staff had done an excellent job of fostering <br />grassroots support and had not come to the workshop with a preconceived notion of what to design. He <br />thought the workshop should be held up as an example for all departments. <br /> <br />Mr. Biggs also complimented the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Division for its Movies in the Parks <br />program. He said that he recently attended a movie shown in Washington Park and noted the high <br />attendance. He suggested the division put on movies in every neighborhood the City could afford to. <br /> <br />Daniel Ronyak <br />, 290 Knapp Lane, announced that there would be a Eugene Film Festival. He said he was <br />part of the group called Oregon Screenwriters that sought to sponsor the festival, along with the Bijou <br />Cinemas, the McDonald Theater, and the University of Oregon. <br /> <br />Mr. Ronyak also addressed the issue of train yard noise. He asked that the City of Eugene approach the <br />problem with creativity, such as forming a team of retired scientists or perhaps university students. He <br />thought such a team could study the problem with a “wide-open mind.” He compared the trains with the <br />Space Shuttle as both conveyed cargo and weighed in excess of a billion pounds. He said the shuttle would <br />dock with the space station in orbit and the docking procedure would produce no noise whatsoever. He <br />wondered if more could not be done to abate train pollution from the rail yard that parallels the Northwest <br />Expressway. He questioned the need for the trains to slam together at all hours of the night with the same <br />noise that a large amount of TNT might generate. He did not believe no technology existed that could <br />mitigate this noise issue. He pointed out that building a berm along side the rail yards would do much to <br />reduce the noise and that type of technology utilized only dirt. He underscored that the train yard should not <br />be using 1940s technology when 1990s technology was available. In conclusion, he related that a study was <br />conducted on the use of speakers that would generate a train whistle noise and focus it only at intersections. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 25, 2005 Page 2 <br /> Regular Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.