Laserfiche WebLink
be proactive in that effort rather than wait for EWEB to act. She thought a lot of people in the community <br />would be grateful if the City took that approach. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman referred to page 12 of the council meeting packet (Attachment B) and recalled that Avenue A <br />was previously removed as unneeded. She wanted to take out the bulleted item at the bottom of the page <br />referencing that before the council approved the plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling, seconded by Ms. Solomon, moved to approve the proposed Hospital Develop- <br />ment in the Central Core Action Plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon said she would support the plan for the time being. She was not interested in endorsing the <br />nd <br />Chambers Street and 2 Avenue site as a Plan B at this time. She thought it would be in the best interest of <br />the public if the City went “back to the drawing board” and looked at sites previously identified both within <br />and outside of the 2-1/2 mile radius. Ms. Solomon suggested that reexamination would involve representa- <br />tives of McKenzie-Willamette. She hoped that when the hospital become interested in a Plan B, the City <br />was “ready to go.” <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor declared a conflict of interest due to his wife’s employment with McKenzie-Willamette Hospital. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman offered an amendment to the motion that stipulated Exhibit 2 was for illustrative purposes and <br />was not adopted as shown, and that the mention of extending Avenue A to the Riverfront Research Park <br />property be deleted. Mr. Poling and Ms. Solomon accepted Ms. Bettman amendment as a friendly <br />amendment to the motion. <br /> <br />Mr. Papé offered an amendment to the motion, stating he would like to see the first paragraph of Attachment <br />B modified with the mention of both the 2004 and 2005 council retreats of the Eugene City Council. Mr. <br />Poling and Ms. Solomon accepted the amendment as a friendly amendment to the motion. Mr. Kelly pointed <br />to the top of page 9 of the council packet as the place the amendment would occur. <br /> <br />The motion passed, 6:1:1; Mr. Pryor abstaining from the vote and Ms. Ortiz voting in op- <br />position to the motion. <br /> <br /> <br />C. WORK SESSION: CITY COUNCIL PRIORITY ISSUE—REVISED RACE PRIORITY <br />ISSUE ACTION PLAN <br /> <br />The council was joined by Human Resources and Risk Services Director Lauren Chouinard and Human <br />Rights Director Greg Rikhoff for the item. Mr. Chouinard acknowledged the contribution of staff members <br />Lynda Rose, Rachel Wells, Karen Loy, and Mr. Rikhoff. <br /> <br />Mr. Chouinard reviewed the changes made to the Race Priority Action Plan in response to council remarks <br />at the June 13 work session on the topic. <br /> <br />Mr. Chouinard noted the inclusion in the meeting packet of the City’s diversity training calendar, which he <br />termed the most extensive in Oregon. He also called the council’s attention to a pledge respecting diversity <br />and honoring human rights, which had been signed by members of the council seven years earlier. He <br />invited questions. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council August 8, 2005 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />